Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Newton's guinea: overvalued gold makes silver-for-gold arbitrage profitable without bound

Proved
GreshamLaw.newton_guinea_arbitrage

by Lucas · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

economicsgreshams-lawmonetary-economics

Let the legal rate at home be rrr silver shillings per gold guinea, and suppose that abroad the gold of one guinea costs the silver of mmm shillings, with

0<m<r0<m<r0<m<r

(gold is overvalued at home, as after Newton fixed the guinea at 21 shillings in 1717). Starting from N>0N>0N>0 shillings, one round of shipping silver abroad, buying gold, coining guineas at home and buying shillings at the legal rate yields Ar,m(N)=NmrA_{r,m}(N)=\tfrac{N}{m}rAr,m​(N)=mN​r shillings. Then

  1. one round is strictly profitable: N<Ar,m(N)N<A_{r,m}(N)N<Ar,m​(N);
  2. repeating the round makes the holding grow without bound: Ar,m n(N)→∞A_{r,m}^{\,n}(N)\to\inftyAr,mn​(N)→∞ as n→∞n\to\inftyn→∞.

This is the mechanism by which good silver coin left Britain and Britain moved onto a de facto gold standard.

Formalization Note Transport and minting costs are ignored.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_GreshamLaw_Model
Formal statement
namespace GreshamLaw

theorem newton_guinea_arbitrage (r m N : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (hmr : m < r) (hN : 0 < N) :
    N < arbitrageRound r m N ∧
      Filter.Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (arbitrageRound r m)^[n] N) Filter.atTop Filter.atTop := by sorry

end GreshamLaw
Source
Wikipedia, "Gresham's law" (PDF export supplied with the request); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham%27s_law
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind

Disclosure — NON-BLIND read-back. This read-back was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statement it describes, with full knowledge of the source article and of the intended meaning. It is not independent, blind testimony and must not be mistaken for one. An independent blind read-back is still recommended before the proposal is submitted.

For all real numbers r,m,Nr,m,Nr,m,N with 0<m0<m0<m, m<rm<rm<r and 0<N0<N0<N, write A(x)=xm⋅rA(x)=\dfrac{x}{m}\cdot rA(x)=mx​⋅r. The statement asserts both:

  1. N<A(N)N<A(N)N<A(N);
  2. the sequence n↦An(N)n\mapsto A^{n}(N)n↦An(N) (AAA composed with itself nnn times and applied to NNN, with A0(N)=NA^{0}(N)=NA0(N)=N), indexed by natural numbers nnn, tends to +∞+\infty+∞: for every real bound BBB there is n0n_0n0​ such that An(N)≥BA^{n}(N)\ge BAn(N)≥B for all n≥n0n\ge n_0n≥n0​.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me