lean_workbook_plus_60772
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Prove that
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_60772 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, (a / (b + c) + b / (a + c) - 2 * (a + b) / (a + b + 2 * c) : ℝ) = (a + b + c) * (a - b) ^ 2 / ((b + c) * (a + c) * (a + b + 2 * c)) ∧ (a / (b + c) + b / (a + c) - 2 * (a + b) / (a + b + 2 * c) : ℝ) ≥ 0 := by sorry
The rational identity and nonnegativity are asserted with zero/negative denominators.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Require a,b,c>0 and prove the exact identity and its nonnegative RHS; more generally state explicit sign and nonzero conditions on every factor.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_60772 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, (a / (b + c) + b / (a + c) - 2 * (a + b) / (a + b + 2 * c) : ℝ) = (a + b + c) * (a - b) ^ 2 / ((b + c) * (a + c) * (a + b + 2 * c)) ∧ (a / (b + c) + b / (a + c) - 2 * (a + b) / (a + b + 2 * c) : ℝ) ≥ 0 := by sorry