Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

No nontrivial Syracuse cycle of period at most one hundred and ninety-nine

Proved
syracuse_period_le_onehundredninetynine_eq_one

by Zexuan Liu · Sep 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

collatznumber-theory

Let TTT be the Syracuse map, sending nnn to the odd part of 3n+13n+13n+1. If mmm is a positive integer with Ta(m)=mT^a(m) = mTa(m)=m for some aaa with 1≤a≤1991 \le a \le 1991≤a≤199, then m=1m = 1m=1.

Equivalently, every Syracuse cycle of length at most 199199199 is the trivial cycle {1}\{1\}{1}. The return time aaa need not be minimal.

The proof is uniform across the 199199199 periods. For each aaa one checks the single numerical inequality

20176a < 2Ka⋅6725a,20176^a \ <\ 2^{K_a}\cdot 6725^a ,20176a < 2Ka​⋅6725a,

where KaK_aKa​ is the least exponent with 3a<2Ka3^a < 2^{K_a}3a<2Ka​, and feeds it to the margin criterion; the threshold 672567256725 is available because no nontrivial cycle contains a value below 672567256725. At a=199a = 199a=199 these are comparisons of 857857857-digit integers.

The bound 199199199 is exactly where this threshold stops: the inequality holds for every a≤199a \le 199a≤199 and fails first at a=200a = 200a=200. Enlarging the verified small-value range moves the boundary further, but never to all periods — 2Ka/3a2^{K_a}/3^a2Ka​/3a comes arbitrarily close to 111 along the convergents of log⁡23\log_2 3log2​3, and at a=306a = 306a=306 no threshold whatsoever suffices.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_syracuseStep
Formal statement
theorem syracuse_period_le_onehundredninetynine_eq_one (m a : ℕ) (hm : 0 < m) (ha : 0 < a)
    (hle : a ≤ 199) (hcyc : syracuseStep^[a] m = m) : m = 1 := by sorry
Source
Collatz mission https://prove2.me/missions/2f34a49f-2016-4de2-9662-fcd1cc96cc67; from syracuse_cycle_eq_one_of_margin_at (756c30cf-ce03-4b10-afe8-8f76f671ae4f) and syracuse_no_cycle_below_6725. Strengthens syracuse_period_le_ninetythree_eq_one (3794ed87-5e54-4843-a40b-28fa6724c62f). Cf. J. C. Lagarias, The 3x+1 Problem and Its Generalizations, Amer. Math. Monthly 92 (1985), Section 5; Simons and de Weger, Acta Arith. 117 (2005) 51-70.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me