Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 18: compressed Choi criterion for k-non-entangling maps

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P19.kNonEntangling_compression

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All Hilbert spaces are finite-dimensional complex spaces with fixed product bases and positive local dimensions. States are positive semidefinite operators of trace one; pure kets have norm one. Let 1≤k≤d1\le k\le d1≤k≤d and let Λ\LambdaΛ be a CP endomap on d×dd\times dd×d. A kkk-dimensional projection means a rectangular coisometry P:Cd→CkP:\mathbb C^d\to\mathbb C^kP:Cd→Ck, with PP†=IkPP^\dagger=I_kPP†=Ik​. Then

Λ is k-non-entangling ⟺ (Id2⊗P⊗Q)J(Λ)(Id2⊗P⊗Q)† is separable for every such P,Q.\Lambda\text{ is }k\text{-non-entangling}\ \Longleftrightarrow\ (I_{d^2}\otimes P\otimes Q)J(\Lambda)(I_{d^2}\otimes P\otimes Q)^\dagger\text{ is separable for every such }P,Q.Λ is k-non-entangling ⟺ (Id2​⊗P⊗Q)J(Λ)(Id2​⊗P⊗Q)† is separable for every such P,Q.

The output partition groups AoutCk:BoutCkA_{\rm out}\mathbb C^k:B_{\rm out}\mathbb C^kAout​Ck:Bout​Ck.

This tests the whole amplified separable cone using coisometries.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P19
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open QAlgorithms QAlgorithms.Entanglement Filter

open scoped Matrix ComplexOrder ComplexConjugate ENNReal

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P19

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P21 (Op FiniteLOCC)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P19 (Bip)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (CP)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P71 (supportPower SupportIncluded)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P19 (epr)

/-- Lemma 18, PDF p.21: coisometry compression criterion on the stated
endomap, with the dimensional domain 1<=k<=d made explicit. -/
theorem kNonEntangling_compression {d k : ℕ} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hkd : k ≤ d)
    (L : Superop (Fin d × Fin d) (Fin d × Fin d)) (hcp : CP L) :
    KNE k L ↔ ∀ P Q : Matrix (Fin k) (Fin d) ℂ,
      Coisometry P → Coisometry Q → IsSeparablePositive (compressChoi L P Q) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P19

end
Source
Entanglement manipulation and distillability beyond LOCC, arXiv:1711.03835v2, PDF p. 21, Lemma 18
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For natural numbers 1≤k≤d1\le k\le d1≤k≤d, let LLL map complex matrices on Cd⊗Cd\mathbb C^d\otimes\mathbb C^dCd⊗Cd to matrices on the same space, and assume that L(X)=∑j=1mKjXKj†L(X)=\sum_{j=1}^m K_jXK_j^\daggerL(X)=∑j=1m​Kj​XKj†​ for some finite family of matrices KjK_jKj​, with no normalization condition imposed on this family. Call an operator separable positive if it is a finite sum ∑jwjAj⊗Bj\sum_j w_j A_j\otimes B_j∑j​wj​Aj​⊗Bj​, where wj≥0w_j\ge0wj​≥0 and each Aj,BjA_j,B_jAj​,Bj​ is positive semidefinite with trace 111; the empty sum is allowed, and the weights need not sum to 111. Then adjoining a kkk-dimensional identity system to each party makes LLL preserve separable positive operators if and only if, for every P,Q∈Ck×dP,Q\in\mathbb C^{k\times d}P,Q∈Ck×d satisfying PP†=QQ†=IkPP^\dagger=QQ^\dagger=I_kPP†=QQ†=Ik​, the operator

((Id⊗P)⊗(Id⊗Q)) CL ((Id⊗P)⊗(Id⊗Q))†\bigl((I_d\otimes P)\otimes(I_d\otimes Q)\bigr)\, C_L\, \bigl((I_d\otimes P)\otimes(I_d\otimes Q)\bigr)^\dagger((Id​⊗P)⊗(Id​⊗Q))CL​((Id​⊗P)⊗(Id​⊗Q))†

is separable positive across (Cd⊗Ck):(Cd⊗Ck)(\mathbb C^d\otimes\mathbb C^k):(\mathbb C^d\otimes\mathbb C^k)(Cd⊗Ck):(Cd⊗Ck). Here the party-grouped Choi operator is defined by

(CL)(c,a),(e,b); (c′,a′),(e′,b′)=[L(∣a,b⟩⟨a′,b′∣)](c,e),(c′,e′),(C_L)_{(c,a),(e,b);\,(c',a'),(e',b')} = \bigl[L(|a,b\rangle\langle a',b'|)\bigr]_{(c,e),(c',e')},(CL​)(c,a),(e,b);(c′,a′),(e′,b′)​=[L(∣a,b⟩⟨a′,b′∣)](c,e),(c′,e′)​,

and adjoining the identity systems means applying LLL to every matrix block obtained by fixing the two ancillary row indices and two ancillary column indices. This preservation condition, together with k>0k>0k>0 and the finite Kraus representation of LLL, is precisely the predicate KNE(k,L)KNE(k,L)KNE(k,L).

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me