Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Every classical channel gives a diagonal S point in T

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P13.diagonalS_inTetrahedron

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let p(l∣k)p(l\mid k)p(l∣k) be any nonnegative conditional law on four symbols, with ∑lp(l∣k)=1\sum_l p(l\mid k)=1∑l​p(l∣k)=1 separately for each input kkk. Define SijS_{ij}Sij​ by Eq. (38), including its factor 1/41/41/4 and six-delta exponent. For the Bell-correlation tetrahedron T=conv⁡{(1,−1,1),(1,1,−1),(−1,−1,−1),(−1,1,1)}T=\operatorname{conv}\{(1,-1,1),(1,1,-1),(-1,-1,-1),(-1,1,1)\}T=conv{(1,−1,1),(1,1,−1),(−1,−1,−1),(−1,1,1)},

(S11,S22,S33)∈T.(S_{11},S_{22},S_{33})\in T.(S11​,S22​,S33​)∈T.

This assertion requires neither a resource state nor a damping parameter. It covers all conditional channels, including laws that are not doubly stochastic.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P13
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P13

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

/-- arXiv:1706.05384v2 PDF pp.5,13, Lemma 24: no resource or damping assumption.
Eq.(38)'s normalization, rather than Appendix B's omitted factor, defines S. -/
theorem diagonalS_inTetrahedron (p : Fin 4 → Fin 4 → ℝ) (hp : ClassicalTeleportationLaw p) :
    (fun i : Fin 3 => sCoordinate p i i.succ) ∈ pauliTetrahedron := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P13

end
Source
Simulation of non-Pauli Channels, arXiv:1706.05384v2, PDF p. 13, Lemma 24
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every real array p=(plk)l,k=03p=(p_{lk})_{l,k=0}^3p=(plk​)l,k=03​ such that plk≥0p_{lk}\ge0plk​≥0 for every l,kl,kl,k and ∑l=03plk=1\sum_{l=0}^3p_{lk}=1∑l=03​plk​=1 for each kkk, define δab=1\delta_{ab}=1δab​=1 when a=ba=ba=b and 000 otherwise. Then the vector v∈R3v\in\mathbb R^3v∈R3 with coordinates

vi=14∑k=03∑l=03(−1)δk0+δi+1,2+δi+1,0+δk,i+1+δi+1,l+δ0lplk,i=0,1,2,v_i=\frac14\sum_{k=0}^3\sum_{l=0}^3 (-1)^{\delta_{k0}+\delta_{i+1,2}+\delta_{i+1,0}+\delta_{k,i+1}+\delta_{i+1,l}+\delta_{0l}} p_{lk}, \qquad i=0,1,2,vi​=41​k=0∑3​l=0∑3​(−1)δk0​+δi+1,2​+δi+1,0​+δk,i+1​+δi+1,l​+δ0l​plk​,i=0,1,2,

belongs to the convex hull of (1,−1,1)(1,-1,1)(1,−1,1), (1,1,−1)(1,1,-1)(1,1,−1), (−1,−1,−1)(-1,-1,-1)(−1,−1,−1), and (−1,1,1)(-1,1,1)(−1,1,1).

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me