For the same u, a and z, W = Q̄ + Q̄u + Q̄ū + Q̄z + Q̄z̄ carries a 2×3 configuration, while no Q̄ + Q̄u + Q̄ū + Q̄w with w ∈ W outside Q̄ + Q̄u + Q̄ū does
ProvedDiazModulus.circle_point_conjugate_pair_configuration_invisible_to_four_dimensional_extensionsLet with algebraic, let , , and let be if , or if . Put and . Then carries a configuration: independent over and independent over with all six products in . But for no outside does carry one.
So the configuration is invisible to Theorem B's four-dimensional spaces. It does not need all of : its six products span the odd part , which does not contain . Since is closed under complex conjugation, a hypothesis brings with it, so is the space Roy's strong six exponentials theorem sees at a candidate; DiazModulus.circle_point_extension_two_by_three_configuration_iff (Theorem B) treats the four-dimensional spaces only. The statement does not involve , so it keeps its content if Diaz's conjecture holds.
Proof. The configuration is DiazModulus.circle_point_conjugate_pair_extension_carries_two_by_three_configuration. Let and suppose carries one. By Theorem B, for one of , , with algebraic and non-zero. Since , exchange gives , which DiazModulus.circle_point_conjugate_pair_extension_excludes_squares_and_reciprocals rules out.
Novelty. Not found in the sources read; it is short (parity plus Theorem B). With the strong six exponentials theorem, the configuration gives at a candidate exclusions that are already one substitution in Diaz (2004, Th. 2) and Diaz (2007, Th. 6(3)): DiazModulus.candidate_div_sq_sub_not_mem_logAlgTilde.
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
theorem circle_point_conjugate_pair_configuration_invisible_to_four_dimensional_extensions (u a z : ℂ)
(hu : u ∉ Qbar) (hρ : IsAlgebraic ℚ (u * conj u)) (ha : a ∈ Qbar) (ha0 : a ≠ 0)
(hz : (a * conj a ≠ (u * conj u) ^ 2 ∧ z = u / (u ^ 2 - a)) ∨
(a * conj a = (u * conj u) ^ 2 ∧ z = u / (u ^ 2 - a) ^ 2)) :
(∃ (x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ), LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) x ∧ LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) y ∧
∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, u, conj u, z, conj z} : Set ℂ)) ∧
∀ w ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, u, conj u, z, conj z} : Set ℂ),
w ∉ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, u, conj u} : Set ℂ) →
¬ ∃ (x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ), LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) x ∧
LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) y ∧
∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ Submodule.span Qbar ({1, u, conj u, w} : Set ℂ) := by
sorry
end DiazModulus