Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 4.7 — K2K_2K2​ is closed and convex, and polyhedral when pos⁡(Ξ~p,T)\operatorname{pos}(\tilde\Xi_{p,T})pos(Ξ~p,T​) is a polyhedral cone

Proved
Wets1974.Feasibility.K2_closed_convex_polyhedral

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

feasibilityp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1polyhedrarecoursestochastic-programming

Let WWW be a fixed mˉ×nˉ\bar m \times \bar nmˉ×nˉ matrix, μ\muμ the (probability) law of ξ=(c,q,p,T)\xi = (c, q, p, T)ξ=(c,q,p,T), Ξ~p,T\tilde\Xi_{p,T}Ξ~p,T​ the support of the marginal law of (p,T)(p,T)(p,T), and

K2={x∈Rn∣p−Tx∈pos⁡W for all (p,T)∈Ξ~p,T}.K_2 = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid p - Tx \in \operatorname{pos} W \text{ for all } (p,T) \in \tilde\Xi_{p,T}\}.K2​={x∈Rn∣p−Tx∈posW for all (p,T)∈Ξ~p,T​}.

Then:

  1. K2K_2K2​ is a closed convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^nRn;
  2. if the closed positive hull pos⁡(Ξ~p,T)\operatorname{pos}(\tilde\Xi_{p,T})pos(Ξ~p,T​) (the closure of the set of nonnegative linear combinations of points of Ξ~p,T\tilde\Xi_{p,T}Ξ~p,T​) is a convex polyhedral cone, then K2K_2K2​ is a convex polyhedron, i.e. K2={x∣Gx≥α}K_2 = \{x \mid Gx \ge \alpha\}K2​={x∣Gx≥α} for some finite system of linear inequalities.

No moment condition on ξ\xiξ is needed. Part 1 says the induced feasibility region is always well behaved; part 2 gives a checkable condition, on the distribution of (p,T)(p, T)(p,T) alone, under which it is described by finitely many linear constraints.

Formalization Note. A convex polyhedral cone is taken to be the set of nonnegative combinations of finitely many vectors of (p,T)(p,T)(p,T)-space Rmˉ×Rmˉ×n\mathbb{R}^{\bar m} \times \mathbb{R}^{\bar m \times n}Rmˉ×Rmˉ×n; a convex polyhedron is the solution set of finitely many weak linear inequalities (the empty set and Rn\mathbb{R}^nRn included). The number of inequalities is an existentially quantified natural number.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_Wets1974_Feasibility_Model
Formal statement
namespace Wets1974.Feasibility

open MeasureTheory

/-- Theorem 4.7, p. 317: `K₂` is a closed convex subset of `ℝⁿ`; moreover, if the closed
positive hull `pos(Ξ̃_{p,T})` is a convex polyhedral cone, then `K₂` is a convex polyhedron. -/
theorem K2_closed_convex_polyhedral {n nb mb : ℕ} (μ : Measure (DataSpace n nb mb))
    [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (W : Matrix (Fin mb) (Fin nb) ℝ) :
    (IsClosed (K2 μ W) ∧ Convex ℝ (K2 μ W)) ∧
      (IsPolyhedralCone (closedPosHull (suppPT μ)) → IsPolyhedron (K2 μ W)) := by sorry

end Wets1974.Feasibility
Source
Wets, Stochastic Programs with Fixed Recourse: The Equivalent Deterministic Program, SIAM Review 16(3), 1974, p. 317, Theorem 4.7
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me