Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§3.1.1 — Pr[B] < 3/4: the preallocation's welfare falls below OPT*/3 with probability < 3/4

Proved
ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding.eventB_bound

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

combinatorial-auctionsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1probabilityrandomized-rounding

Let v1,…,vnv_1,\dots,v_nv1​,…,vn​ be normalized, monotone valuations and let xxx be LP-feasible with value L=∑i,Sxi,Svi(S)L=\sum_{i,S}x_{i,S}v_i(S)L=∑i,S​xi,S​vi​(S). Suppose L>3 vi(M)L>3\,v_i(M)L>3vi​(M) for every bidder iii, i.e. L>3max⁡ivi(M)L>3\max_i v_i(M)L>3maxi​vi​(M). Let A=∑ivi(Si)A=\sum_i v_i(S_i)A=∑i​vi​(Si​) be the welfare of the randomized-rounding preallocation and BBB the event A<L/3A<L/3A<L/3. Then

Pr⁡[B]=Pr⁡[A<L3]<34.\Pr[B]=\Pr\Big[A<\frac{L}{3}\Big]<\frac34.Pr[B]=Pr[A<3L​]<43​.

Together with the items bound, this shows that one round of randomized rounding produces a preallocation with both required properties with constant probability.

Formalization Note The paper normalizes max⁡ivi(M)=1\max_i v_i(M)=1maxi​vi​(M)=1 and assumes OPT∗>3OPT^*>3OPT∗>3; the statement uses the scale-free equivalent L>3max⁡ivi(M)L>3\max_i v_i(M)L>3maxi​vi​(M). The paper's definition of BBB drops the sum ("vi(Si)<13OPT∗v_i(S_i)<\frac13 OPT^*vi​(Si​)<31​OPT∗"); the display Pr⁡[B]=Pr⁡[A<OPT∗/3]\Pr[B]=\Pr[A<OPT^*/3]Pr[B]=Pr[A<OPT∗/3] fixes the meaning used here. The paper's text announces Pr⁡[B]<3/4\Pr[B]<3/4Pr[B]<3/4 and its display ends with ≤3/4\le 3/4≤3/4; the strict inequality is stated, which the display's middle bound 9/(4 OPT∗)9/(4\,OPT^*)9/(4OPT∗) with OPT∗>3OPT^*>3OPT∗>3 gives. The statement assumes only LP feasibility of xxx (the paper uses the optimal xxx, which is a special case).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Auction
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_LP
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding

theorem eventB_bound {n m : ℕ} (v : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ)
    (hnorm : ∀ i, IsNormalized (v i)) (hmono : ∀ i, IsMonotone (v i))
    (x : Fin n → Finset (Fin m) → ℝ) (hx : IsLPFeasible x)
    (hlarge : ∀ i, 3 * v i Finset.univ < lpValue v x) :
    roundProb x (fun σ => welfare v σ < lpValue v x / 3) < 3 / 4 := by sorry

end ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, p. 6, §3.1.1, the paragraph 'We will now prove that Pr[B] < 3/4' and the display bounding Pr[B]
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me