Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 6, p. 15 — continuum second welfare theorem

Disproved
InfFisher.Linear.lemma_6

by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

convex-optimizationfair-divisionfisher-marketp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1pareto-optimality

Let Θ⊆Rd\Theta\subseteq\mathbb R^dΘ⊆Rd be compact. Each buyer iii has a nonnegative integrable valuation viv_ivi​ with ∫Θvi>0\int_\Theta v_i>0∫Θ​vi​>0. If xxx is a Pareto optimal feasible allocation, then there are budgets Bi≥0B_i\ge0Bi​≥0 and an integrable nonnegative price ppp for which (x,p)(x,p)(x,p) is a Fisher market equilibrium:

∃B∈R+n,  ∃p,(x,p) is a market equilibrium for (v,B).\exists B\in\mathbb R_+^n,\;\exists p,\qquad (x,p)\text{ is a market equilibrium for }(v,B).∃B∈R+n​,∃p,(x,p) is a market equilibrium for (v,B).

The utility ⟨vi,xi⟩\langle v_i,x_i\rangle⟨vi​,xi​⟩ is therefore buyer iii's equilibrium utility. This continuum version of the second welfare theorem supports the interval utility characterization.

Formalization Note Valuations and allocations are functions on Euclidean space with Lebesgue measure restricted to Θ\ThetaΘ. Budgets may be zero, as the paper states.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_InfFisher_Linear_Setting
Formal statement
namespace InfFisher.Linear

open MeasureTheory

/-- Gao–Kroer, Lemma 6: a second welfare theorem for a continuum of items. -/
theorem lemma_6 {d n : ℕ} (Θ : Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d)))
    (hΘ : IsCompact Θ)
    (v : Fin n → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℝ)
    (hv : ∀ i, Integrable (v i) (volume.restrict Θ))
    (hv0 : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[volume.restrict Θ] v i)
    (hvpos : ∀ i, 0 < ∫ θ in Θ, v i θ)
    (x : Fin n → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) → ℝ)
    (hx : InfFisher.EG.IsParetoOptimal (volume.restrict Θ) v x) :
    ∃ B : Fin n → ℝ, (∀ i, 0 ≤ B i) ∧
      ∃ p, IsME (volume.restrict Θ) v B x p := by sorry

end InfFisher.Linear
Source
Gao & Kroer, Infinite-Dimensional Fisher Markets and Tractable Fair Division, arXiv:2010.03025v5, Lemma 6, p. 15
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me