Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The circle of a homogeneous map turns at angular speed α\alphaα

Disproved
HarmonicBuilding.circleAngularSpeed

by Shuze Chen · Aug 27, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

comparison-geometryeuclidean-buildingsharmonic-mapsmetric-geometry

Let MMM be a conical Euclidean building of type WWW and h:C→Mh:\mathbb C\to Mh:C→M a nonconstant homogeneous harmonic map of order α\alphaα about 000 whose unit circle lies at constant distance LLL from the cone point h(0)h(0)h(0). Then there is a δ>0\delta>0δ>0 such that for ∣θ1−θ2∣≤δ|\theta_1-\theta_2|\le\delta∣θ1​−θ2​∣≤δ,

∠~h(0)(h(eiθ1), h(eiθ2))=α ∣θ1−θ2∣.\widetilde\angle_{h(0)}\bigl(h(e^{i\theta_1}),\,h(e^{i\theta_2})\bigr)=\alpha\,|\theta_1-\theta_2| .∠h(0)​(h(eiθ1​),h(eiθ2​))=α∣θ1​−θ2​∣.

Role. This is Lemma 4.2(1) of the source: after rescaling the circle into the space of directions at h(0)h(0)h(0) — whose metric is precisely the angle at h(0)h(0)h(0) — the map θ↦h(eiθ)\theta\mapsto h(e^{i\theta})θ↦h(eiθ) is a local geodesic of constant speed α\alphaα. It is the statement that turns an analytic quantity, the order α\alphaα, into a geometric one: the speed of a closed local geodesic in a spherical building of type WWW. Everything that follows — pushing the curve into the model chamber SN−1/W\mathbb S^{N-1}/WSN−1/W, recognizing it as a closed billiards path, lifting it to a great circle and reading off the period — is about that curve and its speed.

Note that the statement is about the angle at the cone point, not about the distance in the building. On a circle of radius LLL the ambient distance between two points is the chord 2L∣sin⁡(αΔ/2)∣2L|\sin(\alpha\Delta/2)|2L∣sin(αΔ/2)∣, strictly less than the arclength αL∣Δ∣\alpha L|\Delta|αL∣Δ∣; it is only in the space of directions that the parametrization has constant speed. Correspondingly, no positivity of LLL needs to be assumed here: it follows from nonconstancy and homogeneity.


Retired 2026-09-07 — disproved, false as formalized. Do not use as a dependency.

The defect is in the shared definition layer, not in the mathematics of Breiner--Dees. IsPlanarKSHarmonicOn (Def_frame_2026_harmonic_building_conical) is defined purely through Lebesgue integrals -- ksEnergy, ksApproxEnergy, IsKSSobolevOn, SameKSTraceOnCircle -- and, unlike the goal-level predicate IsKSHarmonic, it does not require ContinuousOn. An a.e.-constant map therefore qualifies as "harmonic", and altering a map on a Lebesgue-null, dilation-invariant set (a ray) preserves every hypothesis -- IsHomogeneousOfOrderOn and NonconstantOn included, both being pointwise -- while destroying the pointwise conclusion. The same gap admits order alpha = 0 for nonconstant maps, which the source excludes.

A faithful restatement needs Continuous h (or the conclusion attached to the continuous representative) together with 0 < alpha. No corrected replacement node exists yet.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_frame_2026_harmonic_building_conical
import Definitions.Def_metric_geodesic_angle
Formal statement
namespace HarmonicBuilding

universe v

theorem circleAngularSpeed
    {N : ℕ} (C : EuclideanCoxeterData N) (M : ConicalBuildingModel.{v} N C)
    (h : ℂ → M.carrier) (alpha L : ℝ)
    (hhom : IsHomogeneousOfOrderOn M Set.univ h 0 alpha)
    (hharm : IsPlanarKSHarmonicOn Set.univ h)
    (hnc : NonconstantOn h Set.univ)
    (hconst : ∀ theta : ℝ, dist (h (circlePoint 0 1 theta)) (h 0) = L) :
    ∃ delta : ℝ, 0 < delta ∧ ∀ theta1 theta2 : ℝ, |theta1 - theta2| ≤ delta →
      MetricGeometry.comparisonAngle (h 0)
          (h (circlePoint 0 1 theta1)) (h (circlePoint 0 1 theta2))
        = alpha * |theta1 - theta2| := by sorry

end HarmonicBuilding
Source
C. Breiner and B. K. Dees, On the Possible Orders of Harmonic Maps into Euclidean Buildings, Calc. Var. PDE (2026), arXiv:2604.16608. The apartment representation is the one displayed in the proof of Lemma 3.2 and reused in the proof of Lemma 4.2; the angular reformulation is Lemma 4.2(1).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me