No exhaustive word family has open pairs of unbounded -adic valuation
ProvedErdos195.no_tame_coverLet be a finite word of integers. An in-order pair of is a pair of letters with occurring before ; it is open if neither continuation nor is a letter of . Let be finite words with (as sets) and , and let with . Then it is impossible that
In the context of Ho-style constructions of -AP-free permutations of (Erdős Problem 195), where the open pairs of a safe word are exactly what force digits of , this rules out any exhaustive construction in which the forced digits are pushed to ever higher positions ("tame" constructions). The statement holds even without assuming the words are safe.
Formalization note: nestedness is ∀ m, ∀ x ∈ P m, x ∈ P (m + 1); is Filter.Tendsto L atTop atTop; "before" is comparison of List.idxOf; is padicValInt 2.
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_Erdos195_defs
namespace Erdos195
theorem no_tame_cover (P : ℕ → List ℤ) (hmono : ∀ m, ∀ x ∈ P m, x ∈ P (m + 1))
(hcov : ∀ x : ℤ, ∃ m, x ∈ P m) (L : ℕ → ℕ) (hL : Filter.Tendsto L Filter.atTop Filter.atTop)
(hopen : ∀ m, ∀ a ∈ P m, ∀ b ∈ P m, (P m).idxOf a < (P m).idxOf b →
2 * b - a ∉ P m → 3 * b - 2 * a ∉ P m → L m ≤ padicValInt 2 (b - a)) : False := by sorry
end Erdos195