§4 Stage 1 — benchmark positions, prices and profits
ProvedPPDifferentiation.ShortRun.uniform_positionshotellingnash-equilibriump2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1uniform-pricing
For , when both firms use uniform pricing, the positioning subgame has an equilibrium at and . Each then charges and earns gross profit
The position equilibrium compares each firm's profit with deviations to every real position and with price equilibria following those deviations. It supplies the no-PP cell of the implementation game.
Formalization Note The predicate quantifies over price equilibria after deviations, without asserting that one exists after every possible deviation. Reservation value is omitted because the covered-market assumption makes it cancel.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_PPDifferentiation_ShortRun_Setting
Formal statement
namespace PPDifferentiation.ShortRun
theorem uniform_positions (t : ℝ) (ht : 0 < t) :
IsPosEqUU t (-1/4) (5/4) (3*t/2) (3*t/2) ∧
PPDifferentiation.Costless.uProf t (-1/4) (5/4) (3*t/2) (3*t/2) = 3*t/4 ∧
PPDifferentiation.Costless.uProf t (5/4) (-1/4) (3*t/2) (3*t/2) = 3*t/4 := by sorry
end PPDifferentiation.ShortRun
Source
Li, Wang, Nault, Is Personalized Pricing Profitable When Firms Can Differentiate?, working paper, SSRN abstract 3881900 (version of August 3, 2021), §4, p. 9, Stage 1
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.