Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 8.17 -- the M-convex intersection theorem

Proved
DiscreteConvex.ConjugacyDuality.m_convex_intersection_theorem

by Shuze Chen · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

combinatoricsconvex-optimizationdiscrete-convex-analysis

Theorem 8.17 (p.219). For M♮^\natural♮-convex functions f1,f2f_1, f_2f1​,f2​ and a point x∗∈dom⁡Zf1∩dom⁡Zf2x^* \in \operatorname{dom}_{\mathbb Z} f_1 \cap \operatorname{dom}_{\mathbb Z} f_2x∗∈domZ​f1​∩domZ​f2​, x∗x^*x∗ jointly minimizes f1+f2f_1+f_2f1​+f2​ if and only if there is a linear functional p∗∈RVp^* \in \mathbb R^Vp∗∈RV separately certifying x∗x^*x∗ as a minimizer of the perturbations f1[−p∗]f_1[-p^*]f1​[−p∗] and f2[+p∗]f_2[+p^*]f2​[+p∗]. This is the function-level generalization of chunk 04's Edmonds's intersection theorem (M-convex sets): it shows the same min-max structure governs joint minimization of a pair of M-convex functions, not merely intersection of their domains.

Formalization Note. The two perturbed-optimality conditions are stated additively (moving the linear shift ⟨p∗,⋅⟩\langle p^*,\cdot\rangle⟨p∗,⋅⟩ to the other side of each inequality) to avoid subtraction on WithTop ℝ.

(Murota, Discrete Convex Analysis, SIAM 2003, DOI 10.1137/1.9780898718508, p.219, Theorem 8.17.)

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_DiscreteConvex_ConjugacyDuality_DomZ
import Definitions.Def_DiscreteConvex_MConvexFunctions_MNaturalConvex
Formal statement
namespace DiscreteConvex.ConjugacyDuality

/-- Theorem 8.17, the M-convex intersection theorem (Murota, *Discrete Convex Analysis*, SIAM
2003, p.219). For M♮-convex functions `f1, f2` and a point `x* ∈ dom_Z f1 ∩ dom_Z f2`,
`f1(x*) + f2(x*) ≤ f1(x) + f2(x)` for all `x ∈ Zⱽ` if and only if there exists `p* ∈ Rⱽ` such
that `f1[-p*](x*) ≤ f1[-p*](x)` and `f2[+p*](x*) ≤ f2[+p*](x)` for all `x ∈ Zⱽ`, where
`f[q](y) = f(y) - ⟨q,y⟩`; the two perturbed inequalities are stated additively (moving the
linear shift to the other side) to avoid subtraction on `WithTop ℝ`. -/
theorem m_convex_intersection_theorem {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (f1 f2 : (V → ℤ) → WithTop ℝ)
    (hf1 : DiscreteConvex.MConvexFunctions.MNaturalConvex f1)
    (hf2 : DiscreteConvex.MConvexFunctions.MNaturalConvex f2)
    (xstar : V → ℤ) (hx1 : xstar ∈ DomZ f1) (hx2 : xstar ∈ DomZ f2) :
    (∀ x : V → ℤ, f1 xstar + f2 xstar ≤ f1 x + f2 x) ↔
      (∃ p : V → ℝ,
        (∀ x : V → ℤ,
          f1 xstar + ((∑ v, (xstar v : ℝ) * p v : ℝ) : WithTop ℝ) ≤
            f1 x + ((∑ v, (x v : ℝ) * p v : ℝ) : WithTop ℝ)) ∧
        (∀ x : V → ℤ,
          f2 xstar + ((∑ v, (x v : ℝ) * p v : ℝ) : WithTop ℝ) ≤
            f2 x + ((∑ v, (xstar v : ℝ) * p v : ℝ) : WithTop ℝ))) := by sorry

end DiscreteConvex.ConjugacyDuality
Source
Murota, Discrete Convex Analysis, SIAM 2003, DOI 10.1137/1.9780898718508, p.219, Theorem 8.17
Human review
  • Endorsed by Community (Bot) · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me