Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Seeliger's paradox: the Poisson equation (3) has no bounded potential for a uniform non-zero density

Proved
CosmoConstCentury.seeliger_poisson_no_bounded_potential

by Lucas · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cosmologygeneral-relativitymathematical-physics

Let G≠0G\neq0G=0 and let ρ≠0\rho\neq0ρ=0 be a constant mass density filling all of Euclidean space R3\mathbb R^3R3. Then the Poisson equation (3) of the review,

∇2Φ=4πGρon R3,\nabla^2\Phi=4\pi G\rho\quad\text{on }\mathbb R^3,∇2Φ=4πGρon R3,

has no solution Φ\PhiΦ that is twice continuously differentiable and bounded.

This is the mathematical form of the difficulty noted by Seeliger: in an infinite, uniformly filled Newtonian universe the gravitational potential cannot be a finite, well-defined (bounded) function.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_CosmoConstCentury_Defs

open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace CosmoConstCentury

theorem seeliger_poisson_no_bounded_potential (G ρ : ℝ) (hG : G ≠ 0) (hρ : ρ ≠ 0) :
    ¬ ∃ Φ : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin 3) → ℝ, ContDiff ℝ 2 Φ ∧ (∃ M : ℝ, ∀ x, |Φ x| ≤ M) ∧
      ∀ x, laplacian3 Φ x = 4 * Real.pi * G * ρ := by sorry

end CosmoConstCentury
Source
C. O'Raifeartaigh, M. O'Keeffe, W. Nahm, S. Mitton, "One hundred years of the cosmological constant: from 'superfluous stunt' to dark energy", Eur. Phys. J. H 43, 73-117 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80061-7; Section 2, p. 75, eq. (3) and surrounding discussion.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)

Disclosure: non-blind read-back. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement (Aristotle, by Harmonic), at the explicit request of the proposal owner. It is not an independent or blind audit, and it must not be treated as independent testimony: its author knew the source paper and the intended meaning while writing it. Reviewers should compare it against the Lean code themselves.

Let GGG and ρ\rhoρ be real numbers with G≠0G\neq0G=0 and ρ≠0\rho\neq0ρ=0. The statement asserts that there is no function Φ:R3→R\Phi:\mathbb R^3\to\mathbb RΦ:R3→R (on Euclidean three-space) satisfying all three of:

  1. Φ\PhiΦ is twice continuously differentiable on all of R3\mathbb R^3R3;
  2. Φ\PhiΦ is bounded: there is a real MMM with ∣Φ(x)∣≤M|\Phi(x)|\le M∣Φ(x)∣≤M for every xxx;
  3. for every x∈R3x\in\mathbb R^3x∈R3, ∇2Φ(x)=4πGρ\nabla^2\Phi(x)=4\pi G\rho∇2Φ(x)=4πGρ, where ∇2Φ=∂12Φ+∂22Φ+∂32Φ\nabla^2\Phi=\partial_1^2\Phi+\partial_2^2\Phi+\partial_3^2\Phi∇2Φ=∂12​Φ+∂22​Φ+∂32​Φ.

The right-hand side is the same constant at every point. No sign condition on GGG or ρ\rhoρ is imposed beyond both being non-zero. Unbounded solutions (such as quadratic polynomials) are not excluded by the statement.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me