Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

A commuting group action descends to a continuous unitary representation

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92.commuting_group_quantization

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let (E,E+,θ)(E,E_+,\theta)(E,E+​,θ) be a reflection-positive complex Hilbert space and let UUU be a strongly continuous unitary representation of a topological group GGG on EEE. Assume U(g)E+⊆E+U(g)E_+\subseteq E_+U(g)E+​⊆E+​ and U(g)θ=θU(g)U(g)\theta=\theta U(g)U(g)θ=θU(g) for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G. There is a strongly continuous unitary representation U^\widehat UU on the canonical OS space such that

U^(g)q(v)=q(U(g)v)(g∈G, v∈E+).\widehat U(g)q(v)=q(U(g)v)\quad(g\in G,\ v\in E_+).U(g)q(v)=q(U(g)v)(g∈G, v∈E+​).

The induced operators satisfy the identity and multiplication laws. This is the OS quantization of the given representation, characterized on the dense canonical quotient image.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P92
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

open scoped ComplexConjugate BigOperators NNReal ENNReal

open MeasureTheory

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

universe u v

variable (E : Type u) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]

variable {E}

/-- Proposition 2.5, PDF p. 9, for an arbitrary topological group. The induced
unitary representation is required to agree with the canonical quotient on every
input, so it is the OS representation, rather than an unrelated representation. -/
theorem commuting_group_quantization [hHilbert : CompleteSpace E] (r : ReflectionData E)
    (G : Type v) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
    (U : G → E ≃ₗᵢ[ℂ] E)
    (hOne : ∀ x, U 1 x = x)
    (hMul : ∀ g h x, U (g * h) x = U g (U h x))
    (hContinuous : ∀ x, Continuous (fun g => U g x))
    (hPlus : ∀ g, ∀ x ∈ r.plus, U g x ∈ r.plus)
    (hTheta : ∀ g x, U g (r.theta x) = r.theta (U g x)) :
    ∃ V : G → OS r ≃ₗᵢ[ℂ] OS r,
      (∀ x, V 1 x = x) ∧
      (∀ g h x, V (g * h) x = V g (V h x)) ∧
      (∀ x, Continuous (fun g => V g x)) ∧
      (∀ g v, V g (osQ r v) = osQ r ⟨U g v, hPlus g v v.property⟩) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

end
Source
Reflection positive one-parameter groups and dilations, arXiv:1312.6161v2, PDF p. 9, Proposition 2.5
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let EEE be a complete complex inner product space, and let rrr consist of a closed complex linear subspace H+H_+H+​ and a complex linear surjective isometry θ\thetaθ satisfying θ2=I\theta^2=Iθ2=I and Re⁡⟨θv,v⟩≥0\operatorname{Re}\langle\theta v,v\rangle\geq0Re⟨θv,v⟩≥0 for all v∈H+v\in H_+v∈H+​. Let Hr\mathcal H_rHr​ be the separated completion of H+H_+H+​ with form [v,w]=⟨θv,w⟩[v,w]=\langle\theta v,w\rangle[v,w]=⟨θv,w⟩ and seminorm Re⁡⟨θv,v⟩\sqrt{\operatorname{Re}\langle\theta v,v\rangle}Re⟨θv,v⟩​, with canonical complex linear map q:H+→Hrq:H_+\to\mathcal H_rq:H+​→Hr​. Let GGG be any group equipped with a topology making it a topological group, and let g↦Ugg\mapsto U_gg↦Ug​ assign a complex linear surjective isometry of EEE to every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G. Assume U1x=xU_1x=xU1​x=x and Ughx=Ug(Uhx)U_{gh}x=U_g(U_hx)Ugh​x=Ug​(Uh​x) for all g,h∈Gg,h\in Gg,h∈G and x∈Ex\in Ex∈E; assume g↦Ugxg\mapsto U_gxg↦Ug​x is continuous for each x∈Ex\in Ex∈E; assume Ugx∈H+U_gx\in H_+Ug​x∈H+​ for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G and x∈H+x\in H_+x∈H+​; and assume Ug(θx)=θ(Ugx)U_g(\theta x)=\theta(U_gx)Ug​(θx)=θ(Ug​x) for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G and x∈Ex\in Ex∈E. Then there exists an assignment g↦Vgg\mapsto V_gg↦Vg​ of complex linear surjective isometries of Hr\mathcal H_rHr​ such that V1a=aV_1a=aV1​a=a and Vgha=Vg(Vha)V_{gh}a=V_g(V_ha)Vgh​a=Vg​(Vh​a) for all g,h∈Gg,h\in Gg,h∈G and a∈Hra\in\mathcal H_ra∈Hr​, the map g↦Vgag\mapsto V_gag↦Vg​a is continuous for every a∈Hra\in\mathcal H_ra∈Hr​, and Vg(qv)=q(Ugv)V_g(qv)=q(U_gv)Vg​(qv)=q(Ug​v) for every g∈Gg\in Gg∈G and v∈H+v\in H_+v∈H+​.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me