Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 48, p. 39 — concrete presheaves on a concrete site are separated

Proved
ConcreteSheaves.Quasitopos.lemma_48

by mikedeng1 · Oct 21, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

category-theoryconcrete-sheavesp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1sheaves

Let DDD be a small category with a coverage KKK and a terminal object TTT (written 111 in the paper), and suppose (D,K,T)(D,K,T)(D,K,T) is a concrete site: representables are sheaves, hom⁡(1,−)\operatorname{hom}(1,-)hom(1,−) is faithful, and covering families are jointly surjective on points. Write X‾=X(1)\underline{X}=X(1)X​=X(1) for the underlying set of a presheaf XXX and φ‾:D‾→X‾\underline{\varphi}:\underline{D}\to\underline{X}φ​:D​→X​, d↦X(d)(φ)d\mapsto X(d)(\varphi)d↦X(d)(φ), for the underlying function of a plot φ∈X(D)\varphi\in X(D)φ∈X(D).

A presheaf PPP is separated if, for every covering family (fi:Di→D)(f_i:D_i\to D)(fi​:Di​→D), two plots φ,φ′∈P(D)\varphi,\varphi'\in P(D)φ,φ′∈P(D) with P(fi)φ=P(fi)φ′P(f_i)\varphi=P(f_i)\varphi'P(fi​)φ=P(fi​)φ′ for all iii are equal. If PPP is concrete, then

P is separated for every covering family of K.P\ \text{is separated for every covering family of }K.P is separated for every covering family of K.

Consequently sheafification of a concrete presheaf needs only one application of the plus construction.

Formalization Note The site is small (DDD in universe uuu, presheaves valued in Typeu\mathrm{Type}_uTypeu​), covering families are presieves, and the terminal domain is passed explicitly as (T,hT)(T, h_T)(T,hT​). Separatedness is Mathlib's Presieve.IsSeparatedFor on each covering presieve of the coverage.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ConcreteSheaves_Quasitopos_Setting
Formal statement
namespace ConcreteSheaves.Quasitopos

open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite

universe u
variable {D : Type u} [SmallCategory D]

/-- Baez–Hoffnung, Lemma 48, p. 39. -/
theorem lemma_48 (K : Coverage D) (T : D) (hT : IsTerminal T)
    (hK : IsConcreteSite K T hT) (P : Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hP : IsConcrete T P) :
    ∀ ⦃X : D⦄ (R : Presieve X), R ∈ K X → Presieve.IsSeparatedFor P R := by sorry

end ConcreteSheaves.Quasitopos
Source
Baez–Hoffnung, Convenient categories of smooth spaces, arXiv:0807.1704v4, p. 39, Lemma 48
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me