Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma B.1, p. 21 — x_s = x^π + B_π^{s−1}(x_1 − x^π) for all s ≥ 1 (x_1 for the printed, undefined x_0)

Proved
AccelVI.MVC.lemma_B_1

by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

linear-recursionmomentump2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1value-iteration

Let (S,A,P,r,λ)(S, A, P, r, \lambda)(S,A,P,r,λ) be a valid finite MDP and π\piπ a policy, with value function vπv^\pivπ. Let (vs)s≥0(v_s)_{s \ge 0}(vs​)s≥0​ be the iterates of Momentum Value Computation with the step sizes (4.2), started from arbitrary v0,v1∈Rnv_0, v_1 \in \mathbb{R}^nv0​,v1​∈Rn, and let BπB_\piBπ​ be the 2n×2n2n \times 2n2n×2n matrix of App. B. Put

xπ=(vπ,vπ)∈R2n,xs=(vs,vs−1)∈R2n(s≥1).x^\pi = (v^\pi, v^\pi) \in \mathbb{R}^{2n}, \qquad x_s = (v_s, v_{s-1}) \in \mathbb{R}^{2n} \quad (s \ge 1).xπ=(vπ,vπ)∈R2n,xs​=(vs​,vs−1​)∈R2n(s≥1).

Then

xs=xπ+Bπ s−1 (x1−xπ)for all s≥1.x_s = x^\pi + B_\pi^{\,s-1}\,(x_1 - x^\pi) \qquad \text{for all } s \ge 1 .xs​=xπ+Bπs−1​(x1​−xπ)for all s≥1.

The lemma reduces the convergence of M-VC to the behaviour of the powers of the single matrix BπB_\piBπ​.

Formalization Note. The paper prints x0−xπx_0 - x^\pix0​−xπ on the right-hand side; x0=(v0,v−1)x_0 = (v_0, v_{-1})x0​=(v0​,v−1​) is undefined since there is no v−1v_{-1}v−1​, and at s=1s = 1s=1 the identity forces the vector to be x1−xπx_1 - x^\pix1​−xπ, so the statement uses x1=(v1,v0)x_1 = (v_1, v_0)x1​=(v1​,v0​), matching the analogous Lemma 5.2 for A-VC. Pairs are functions on S⊕SS \oplus SS⊕S (Sum.elim), the first copy holding the newer iterate.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_mm_basic
import Definitions.Def_AccelVI_MVC_Setting
Formal statement
namespace AccelVI.MVC

variable {S A : Type*} [Fintype S] [DecidableEq S] [Fintype A]

/-- Lemma B.1, p. 21 (with x₁ for the printed, undefined x₀): for the M-VC iterates with step sizes (4.2),
x_s = (v_s, v_{s−1}) satisfies x_s = x^π + B_π^{s−1}(x₁ − x^π) for all s ≥ 1, where x^π = (v^π, v^π). -/
theorem lemma_B_1 (M : MDP S A) (hM : M.Valid) (pol : S → A → ℝ) (hpol : IsPolicy pol)
    (v0 v1 : S → ℝ) (s : ℕ) (hs : 1 ≤ s) :
    Sum.elim (mvc M pol (alphaMVC M.lam) (betaMVC M.lam) v0 v1 s)
        (mvc M pol (alphaMVC M.lam) (betaMVC M.lam) v0 v1 (s - 1)) =
      Sum.elim (valuePol M pol) (valuePol M pol) +
        ((Bpol M pol) ^ (s - 1)).mulVec
          (Sum.elim v1 v0 - Sum.elim (valuePol M pol) (valuePol M pol)) := by sorry

end AccelVI.MVC
Source
Goyal & Grand-Clément, A First-Order Approach to Accelerated Value Iteration, arXiv:1905.09963v7, p. 21, Lemma B.1 (printed x_0 read as x_1)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 15, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me