Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma A.2

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P07.pointwiseSummable_absolute

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let XXX be a topological space and (ϕi:X→R)i∈I(\phi_i:X\to\mathbb R)_{i\in I}(ϕi​:X→R)i∈I​ a family whose finite partial sums converge at every point. Then its absolute-value family is pointwise summable:

∀x∈X,∑i∈I∣ϕi(x)∣ converges in R.\forall x\in X,\qquad\sum_{i\in I}|\phi_i(x)|\text{ converges in }\mathbb R.∀x∈X,i∈I∑​∣ϕi​(x)∣ converges in R.

The sums are unconditional, indexed by finite subsets of III. This is an existence statement about pointwise sums, without a continuity or local uniform convergence conclusion.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P07
Formal statement
noncomputable section

universe u v

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P07

open CategoryTheory Topology TopologicalSpace

/-- Lemma A.2, PDF p. 33: the absolute-value family is pointwise summable.
There is no continuity or local uniform convergence assertion here. -/
theorem pointwiseSummable_absolute
    (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] (I : Type v) (phi : I → X → ℝ)
    (hphi : ∀ x, Summable (fun i => phi i x)) :
    ∀ x, Summable (fun i => |phi i x|) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P07

end
Source
Cohomology of Local Cochains, arXiv:1110.2661v2, PDF p. 33, Lemma A.2
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let XXX be any topological space, let III be any index type, and let ϕ:I→(X→R)\phi:I\to(X\to\mathbb R)ϕ:I→(X→R) be a family of real-valued functions. Suppose that for every x∈Xx\in Xx∈X, the family (ϕi(x))i∈I(\phi_i(x))_{i\in I}(ϕi​(x))i∈I​ is summable, meaning that its finite partial sums converge in R\mathbb RR. Then for every x∈Xx\in Xx∈X, the family (∣ϕi(x)∣)i∈I(|\phi_i(x)|)_{i\in I}(∣ϕi​(x)∣)i∈I​ is also summable. No countability assumption on III or continuity assumption on the functions is imposed; the empty index type is included, and if XXX is empty both pointwise assertions are vacuous.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me