Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Asymptotic formula for linear Cauchy–Riemann equations on a half-cylinder

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.halfCyl_asymptotic_formula

by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

asymptotic-operatorpseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S:R2→R2n×2nS:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^{2n\times2n}S:R2→R2n×2n be C∞C^\inftyC∞ and 111-periodic in ttt, S∞S_\inftyS∞​ a C∞C^\inftyC∞ 111-periodic loop of symmetric matrices, and d>0d>0d>0 with S−S∞S-S_\inftyS−S∞​ decaying like e−dse^{-ds}e−ds in C∞C^\inftyC∞. Let ζ\zetaζ be a solution of ∂sζ+J0∂tζ+Sζ=0\partial_s\zeta+J_0\partial_t\zeta+S\zeta=0∂s​ζ+J0​∂t​ζ+Sζ=0 on the half-cylinder, not identically zero on (0,∞)×R(0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}(0,∞)×R, with ∥ζ(s,t)∥≤Ceδ0s\|\zeta(s,t)\|\le Ce^{\delta_0s}∥ζ(s,t)∥≤Ceδ0​s for s>0s>0s>0. Then there are an eigenvalue μ≤δ0\mu\le\delta_0μ≤δ0​ of −J0∂t−S∞-J_0\partial_t-S_\infty−J0​∂t​−S∞​ and an eigenfunction eee for μ\muμ such that e−μsζ(s,t)−e(t)→0e^{-\mu s}\zeta(s,t)-e(t)\to0e−μsζ(s,t)−e(t)→0 in C∞C^\inftyC∞.

Formalization Note The eigenfunction is IsLoopEigen Sinf μ e; the convergence is TendstoZeroCInfty of fun p => Real.exp (-(μ * p.1)) • ζ p - e p.2.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Asymptotic formula for linear Cauchy–Riemann equations on a half-cylinder: if `S(s, t) - S∞(t)`
decays exponentially in `C^∞` and `ζ` is a solution of `∂ₛζ + J₀ ∂ₜζ + S ζ = 0`, not identically
zero, with `‖ζ(s, t)‖ ≤ C e^{δ₀ s}`, then there are an eigenvalue `μ ≤ δ₀` of `-J₀ ∂ₜ - S∞` and an
eigenfunction `e` with `e^{-μs} ζ(s, t) - e(t) → 0` in `C^∞`. -/
theorem halfCyl_asymptotic_formula {n : ℕ} (S : ℝ × ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Mat n)
    (hS : ∀ i j, ContDiff ℝ ∞ (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => S p i j)) (hSper : ∀ s t : ℝ, S (s, t + 1) = S (s, t))
    (Sinf : ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Mat n) (hSinf : CauchyRiemannIndex.IsSymLoop Sinf)
    (hSinf' : ∀ i j, ContDiff ℝ ∞ (fun t => Sinf t i j))
    (d : ℝ) (hd : 0 < d) (hSas : IsExpAsymptoticTo S Sinf d)
    (ζ : ℝ × ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Vec n) (hζ : IsHalfCylSolution S ζ)
    (hne : ∃ p : ℝ × ℝ, 0 < p.1 ∧ ζ p ≠ 0)
    (C δ₀ : ℝ) (hgrowth : ∀ s > 0, ∀ t : ℝ, ‖ζ (s, t)‖ ≤ C * Real.exp (δ₀ * s)) :
    ∃ μ : ℝ, μ ≤ δ₀ ∧ ∃ e : ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Vec n, IsLoopEigen Sinf μ e ∧
      TendstoZeroCInfty (fun p : ℝ × ℝ => Real.exp (-(μ * p.1)) • ζ p - e p.2) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
C. Wendl, Lectures on Symplectic Field Theory, lecture notes, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2026 version); earlier version arXiv:1612.01009, Theorem 4.8.2, formula (4.26); R. Siefring, Relative asymptotic behavior of pseudoholomorphic half-cylinders, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), arXiv:math/0702356, Appendix A
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.halfCyl_asymptotic_formula

Setting. Fix n∈Nn \in \mathbb Nn∈N (including n=0n = 0n=0). E=R2nE = \mathbb R^{2n}E=R2n with coordinates (a1,…,an,b1,…,bn)(a_1,\dots,a_n,b_1,\dots,b_n)(a1​,…,an​,b1​,…,bn​), the Euclidean inner product and the Euclidean norm ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\|∥⋅∥. Mat\mathrm{Mat}Mat denotes real 2n×2n2n \times 2n2n×2n matrices indexed the same way, acting on EEE by matrix multiplication; J0=(0−II0)J_0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -I \\ I & 0\end{pmatrix}J0​=(0I​−I0​), so J0(a,b)=(−b,a)J_0(a,b) = (-b,a)J0​(a,b)=(−b,a). Points of R2\mathbb R^2R2 are written (s,t)(s,t)(s,t), and R2\mathbb R^2R2 carries the sup norm. For a map fff on R2\mathbb R^2R2, DmfD^m fDmf is its mmm-th Fréchet derivative (zero at points where fff is not mmm times differentiable), D0f=fD^0 f = fD0f=f, measured in operator norm. Partial derivatives are ∂su=Du (1,0)\partial_s u = Du\,(1,0)∂s​u=Du(1,0) and ∂tu=Du (0,1)\partial_t u = Du\,(0,1)∂t​u=Du(0,1).

Hypotheses.

  • S:R2→MatS : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathrm{Mat}S:R2→Mat; every entry (s,t)↦S(s,t)ij(s,t) \mapsto S(s,t)_{ij}(s,t)↦S(s,t)ij​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on R2\mathbb R^2R2; and S(s,t+1)=S(s,t)S(s, t+1) = S(s,t)S(s,t+1)=S(s,t) for all s,ts, ts,t.
  • S∞:R→MatS_\infty : \mathbb R \to \mathrm{Mat}S∞​:R→Mat is a symmetric loop (continuous, 111-periodic, each S∞(t)S_\infty(t)S∞​(t) symmetric), and every entry t↦S∞(t)ijt \mapsto S_\infty(t)_{ij}t↦S∞​(t)ij​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞.
  • d>0d > 0d>0, and SSS is exponentially asymptotic to S∞S_\inftyS∞​ with rate ddd: for every pair (i,j)(i,j)(i,j), the function fij(s,t)=S(s,t)ij−S∞(t)ijf_{ij}(s,t) = S(s,t)_{ij} - S_\infty(t)_{ij}fij​(s,t)=S(s,t)ij​−S∞​(t)ij​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on (s0,∞)×R(s_0,\infty) \times \mathbb R(s0​,∞)×R for some s0s_0s0​, and for every m≥0m \ge 0m≥0 there are real Cm,smC_m, s_mCm​,sm​ with ∥Dmfij(s,t)∥≤Cme−ds\|D^m f_{ij}(s,t)\| \le C_m e^{-d s}∥Dmfij​(s,t)∥≤Cm​e−ds for all s≥sms \ge s_ms≥sm​ and all ttt.
  • ζ:R2→E\zeta : \mathbb R^2 \to Eζ:R2→E is a half-cylinder solution for SSS: ζ\zetaζ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on (0,∞)×R(0,\infty) \times \mathbb R(0,∞)×R; ζ(s,t+1)=ζ(s,t)\zeta(s,t+1) = \zeta(s,t)ζ(s,t+1)=ζ(s,t) for all real s,ts, ts,t (including s≤0s \le 0s≤0); and for all s>0s > 0s>0 and all ttt,
∂sζ(s,t)+J0 ∂tζ(s,t)+S(s,t) ζ(s,t)=0.\partial_s \zeta(s,t) + J_0\, \partial_t \zeta(s,t) + S(s,t)\, \zeta(s,t) = 0.∂s​ζ(s,t)+J0​∂t​ζ(s,t)+S(s,t)ζ(s,t)=0.
  • ζ(s,t)≠0\zeta(s,t) \neq 0ζ(s,t)=0 for at least one point with s>0s > 0s>0.
  • CCC and δ0\delta_0δ0​ are real numbers (no sign constraints) with
∥ζ(s,t)∥≤C eδ0sfor all s>0, t∈R.\|\zeta(s,t)\| \le C\, e^{\delta_0 s} \quad \text{for all } s > 0,\ t \in \mathbb R.∥ζ(s,t)∥≤Ceδ0​sfor all s>0, t∈R.

No nondegeneracy condition on S∞S_\inftyS∞​ is assumed.

Conclusion. There exist a real number μ\muμ with μ≤δ0\mu \le \delta_0μ≤δ0​ and a map e:R→Ee : \mathbb R \to Ee:R→E such that:

  • eee is an eigenvector of S∞S_\inftyS∞​ with eigenvalue μ\muμ: eee is C∞C^\inftyC∞, 111-periodic, e(t)≠0e(t) \neq 0e(t)=0 for some ttt, and for all ttt
−J0 e′(t)−S∞(t) e(t)=μ e(t);-J_0\, e'(t) - S_\infty(t)\, e(t) = \mu\, e(t);−J0​e′(t)−S∞​(t)e(t)=μe(t);
  • the function g(s,t)=e−μs ζ(s,t)−e(t)g(s,t) = e^{-\mu s}\, \zeta(s,t) - e(t)g(s,t)=e−μsζ(s,t)−e(t) tends to 000 in C∞C^\inftyC∞: ggg is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on (s0′,∞)×R(s_0', \infty) \times \mathbb R(s0′​,∞)×R for some s0′s_0's0′​, and for every m≥0m \ge 0m≥0 and every ε>0\varepsilon > 0ε>0 there is s1s_1s1​ with ∥Dmg(s,t)∥≤ε\|D^m g(s,t)\| \le \varepsilon∥Dmg(s,t)∥≤ε for all s≥s1s \ge s_1s≥s1​ and all ttt.

The bound μ≤δ0\mu \le \delta_0μ≤δ0​ is non-strict. For n=0n = 0n=0, EEE is the zero space, so the hypothesis that ζ\zetaζ is somewhere nonzero cannot hold and the statement is vacuous; similarly, if C≤0C \le 0C≤0 the growth bound forces ζ=0\zeta = 0ζ=0 on s>0s > 0s>0, contradicting that hypothesis.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me