Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 5.3, p. 21 — the dominating ODE with cubic F has a bounded solution for every T iff (i), (ii) or (iii)

Proved
UnifiedFBSDE.Cubic.theorem_5_3

by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

blow-updominating-odefbsdeglobal-existencep2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Consider the linear FBSDE (4.1) with constant coefficients and σ3=0\sigma_3=0σ3​=0, terminal coefficient h∈Rh\in\mathbb Rh∈R, and its dominating ODE

yt=h+∫tTF(ys) ds,F(y)=f1+[f2+b1+σ1f3]y+[b2+f3σ2+b3σ1]y2+σ2b3y3.(5.3–5.4)y_t=h+\int_t^T F(y_s)\,ds,\qquad F(y)=f_1+[f_2+b_1+\sigma_1f_3]y+[b_2+f_3\sigma_2+b_3\sigma_1]y^2+\sigma_2b_3y^3. \tag{5.3–5.4}yt​=h+∫tT​F(ys​)ds,F(y)=f1​+[f2​+b1​+σ1​f3​]y+[b2​+f3​σ2​+b3​σ1​]y2+σ2​b3​y3.(5.3–5.4)

Then (5.3) has a bounded solution on [0,T][0,T][0,T] for every T>0T>0T>0 if and only if one of the following holds:

  1. F(h)≥0F(h)\ge0F(h)≥0 and FFF has a zero in [h,∞)[h,\infty)[h,∞);
  2. F(h)≤0F(h)\le0F(h)≤0 and FFF has a zero in (−∞,h](-\infty,h](−∞,h];
  3. σ2b3=0\sigma_2b_3=0σ2​b3​=0 and b2+f3σ2+b3σ1=0b_2+f_3\sigma_2+b_3\sigma_1=0b2​+f3​σ2​+b3​σ1​=0.

This is a sharp, checkable criterion for the existence of a bounded solution of the dominating ODE on an arbitrarily long horizon. In the paper's framework that solution yields a regular decoupling field, and with it well-posedness of the linear FBSDE. In this sense the result marks the limits of solvability for general FBSDEs.

Formalization Note. "For arbitrary TTT" is a universal quantifier over T>0T>0T>0 placed outside the existential over yyy. A solution requires the integrand to be integrable on every [t,T][t,T][t,T] (see the definition file). The page's "zero point in [h,∞)[h,\infty)[h,∞)" is ∃ l≥h\exists\,l\ge h∃l≥h with F(l)=0F(l)=0F(l)=0, and similarly for (−∞,h](-\infty,h](−∞,h].

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_UnifiedFBSDE_Cubic_Setting
Formal statement
namespace UnifiedFBSDE.Cubic

/-- Theorem 5.3, p. 21. -/
theorem theorem_5_3 (c : Coeffs) (h : ℝ) :
    (∀ T : ℝ, 0 < T → ∃ y : ℝ → ℝ, IsBoundedSolution (fun _ y => c.F y) h T y) ↔
      ((0 ≤ c.F h ∧ ∃ l : ℝ, h ≤ l ∧ c.F l = 0) ∨
        (c.F h ≤ 0 ∧ ∃ l : ℝ, l ≤ h ∧ c.F l = 0) ∨
        (c.σ₂ * c.b₃ = 0 ∧ c.b₂ + c.f₃ * c.σ₂ + c.b₃ * c.σ₁ = 0)) := by sorry

end UnifiedFBSDE.Cubic
Source
Ma, Wu, Zhang and Zhang, On well-posedness of forward–backward SDEs—a unified approach, arXiv:1110.4658v2, p. 21, Theorem 5.3
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me