Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Trace-norm contraction on Hermitian inputs

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P81.hermitian_trace_norm_contraction

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let ρ\rhoρ be any Hermitian matrix on a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, and let FFF be a complex-linear, completely positive, trace-preserving map to another finite-dimensional complex matrix space. Then

∥F(ρ)∥1≤∥ρ∥1.\|F(\rho)\|_1\le\|\rho\|_1.∥F(ρ)∥1​≤∥ρ∥1​.

Here the trace norm is Tr⁡M†M\operatorname{Tr}\sqrt{M^\dagger M}TrM†M​, without a factor of one half. The input need not be positive or have trace one, so the statement controls signed Hermitian perturbations as well as states.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P81
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ENNReal

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P81

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P54 (relativeEntropyBits)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Bridge50.P44 (ClassicalFirst)

/-- Lemma 1, PDF p.9: contraction for arbitrary Hermitian inputs, not merely states. -/
theorem hermitian_trace_norm_contraction {I J : Type*}
    [Fintype I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq I] [DecidableEq J]
    (rho : Matrix I I ℂ) (hrho : rho.IsHermitian) (F : Superop I J)
    (hF : IsChannel F) : traceNorm (F rho) ≤ traceNorm rho := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P81

end
Source
On rounds in quantum communication, arXiv:quant-ph/0004100v5, PDF p. 9, Lemma 1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For all finite types I,JI,JI,J with decidable equality, every Hermitian complex matrix ρ\rhoρ on III, and every function FFF from complex matrices on III to complex matrices on JJJ, suppose there exist a natural number mmm and matrices E0,…,Em−1E_0,\ldots,E_{m-1}E0​,…,Em−1​ from CI\mathbb C^ICI to CJ\mathbb C^JCJ such that

∑j=0m−1Ej†Ej=1,F(X)=∑j=0m−1EjXEj†for every matrix X.\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}E_j^\dagger E_j=1, \qquad F(X)=\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}E_jXE_j^\dagger \quad\text{for every matrix }X.j=0∑m−1​Ej†​Ej​=1,F(X)=j=0∑m−1​Ej​XEj†​for every matrix X.

Then ∥F(ρ)∥1≤∥ρ∥1\|F(\rho)\|_1\le\|\rho\|_1∥F(ρ)∥1​≤∥ρ∥1​, where ∥X∥1=Re⁡tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=RetrX†X​, with the square root defined by continuous functional calculus. The matrix ρ\rhoρ need not be positive or normalized. Empty index types and m=0m=0m=0 are included whenever the stated completeness equation can hold.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me