Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Dirac comb factorization and corrected periodization

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38.dirac_comb_factorization

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let S=S(R;C)\mathcal S=\mathcal S(\mathbb R;\mathbb C)S=S(R;C) have its full Fréchet topology, put ψ^(u)=∫e−iuxψ(x) dx\widehat\psi(u)=\int e^{-iux}\psi(x)\,dxψ​(u)=∫e−iuxψ(x)dx, and let σ=∑m∈Zδm\sigma=\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}\delta_mσ=∑m∈Z​δm​. Fix a complex Hilbert isometric isomorphism W:ℓ2(Z)→L2(R,dx)W:\ell^2(\mathbb Z)\to L^2(\mathbb R,dx)W:ℓ2(Z)→L2(R,dx). The Fourier samples are square summable, Qψ=W((ψ^(m))m)Q\psi=W((\widehat\psi(m))_m)Qψ=W((ψ​(m))m​) is continuous complex-linear, and

∥Qψ∥22=∑m∈Z∣ψ^(m)∣2=∫∣ψ^∣2 dσ.\|Q\psi\|_2^2=\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}|\widehat\psi(m)|^2=\int|\widehat\psi|^2\,d\sigma.∥Qψ∥22​=m∈Z∑​∣ψ​(m)∣2=∫∣ψ​∣2dσ.

The adjoint product is continuous into the distribution anti-dual and satisfies, for all ψ,φ∈S\psi,\varphi\in\mathcal Sψ,φ∈S,

⟨Q∗Qψ,φ⟩=2π∫R(∑m∈Zψ(x+2πm))φ(x)‾ dx.\langle Q^*Q\psi,\varphi\rangle=2\pi\int_{\mathbb R}\left(\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}\psi(x+2\pi m)\right)\overline{\varphi(x)}\,dx.⟨Q∗Qψ,φ⟩=2π∫R​(m∈Z∑​ψ(x+2πm))φ(x)​dx.

The series converges absolutely at every xxx, and the displayed integral is integrable. The factor 2π2\pi2π corrects (12.2) under the paper's stated Fourier convention; it is a disclosed source correction.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P38
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38

open MeasureTheory Filter

open scoped Topology ComplexConjugate ENNReal

/-- Proposition 12.1, PDF pp.26--27. SOURCE CORRECTION: under the paper's
unnormalized Fourier convention, (12.2) must read Q*Q=2π times periodization.
The printed W must be isometric, as (12.1) and its proof require. All continuity
is Schwartz Fréchet continuity; no Lebesgue-L2 boundedness is asserted.
The anti-dual formulation is the distributional equality, not pointwise evaluation. -/
theorem dirac_comb_factorization
    (W : SequenceL2 ≃ₗᵢ[ℂ] L2 (volume : Measure (SpectralDomain 1))) :
    ∃ Q : ComplexTest 1 →L[ℂ] L2 (volume : Measure (SpectralDomain 1)),
      ∃ A : ComplexTest 1 →L[ℂ] AntiDual 1,
        (∀ ψ, Q ψ = W (l2Class Measure.count (combSamples ψ))) ∧
        (∀ ψ, MemLp (combSamples ψ) 2 Measure.count ∧
          fourierEnergy diracComb ψ = ENNReal.ofReal (‖Q ψ‖ ^ 2) ∧
          ∀ x, Summable (fun m : ℤ => ψ (x + point1 (2 * Real.pi * (m : ℝ))))) ∧
        (∀ ψ, A ψ = adjointProduct Q ψ ∧ ∀ φ : ComplexTest 1,
          Integrable (fun x => periodization ψ x * conj (φ x)) volume ∧
          A ψ φ = (2 * Real.pi : ℂ) *
            ∫ x, periodization ψ x * conj (φ x)) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P38

end
Source
Stochastic processes induced by singular operators, arXiv:1109.5273v1, PDF p. 26, Proposition 12.1: Dirac comb factorization and periodization
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let X=RFin⁡1X=\mathbb R^{\operatorname{Fin}1}X=RFin1 with Euclidean volume dxdxdx, write ι(a)∈X\iota(a)\in Xι(a)∈X for the vector whose sole coordinate is a∈Ra\in\mathbb Ra∈R, and let SC(X)\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)SC​(X) be the complex-valued Schwartz space. For every surjective complex-linear isometry W:ℓ2(Z;C)→L2(X,dx;C)W:\ell^2(\mathbb Z;\mathbb C)\to L^2(X,dx;\mathbb C)W:ℓ2(Z;C)→L2(X,dx;C), where ℓ2\ell^2ℓ2 uses counting measure, there exist continuous complex-linear maps

Q:SC(X)→L2(X,dx;C),A:SC(X)→SC(X)×,Q:\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)\to L^2(X,dx;\mathbb C), \qquad A:\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)\to\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)^\times,Q:SC​(X)→L2(X,dx;C),A:SC​(X)→SC​(X)×,

where SC(X)×\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)^\timesSC​(X)× is the space of continuous conjugate-linear functionals, with the following properties. Define

ψ^(u)=∫Xe−i⟨u,x⟩ψ(x) dx,bψ(m)=ψ^(ι(m)),σcomb=∑m∈Zδι(m),Pψ(x)=∑m∈Zψ(x+ι(2πm)).\widehat\psi(u)=\int_X e^{-i\langle u,x\rangle}\psi(x)\,dx,\qquad b_\psi(m)=\widehat\psi(\iota(m)),\qquad \sigma_{\mathrm{comb}}=\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}\delta_{\iota(m)}, \qquad P_\psi(x)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb Z}\psi\bigl(x+\iota(2\pi m)\bigr).ψ​(u)=∫X​e−i⟨u,x⟩ψ(x)dx,bψ​(m)=ψ​(ι(m)),σcomb​=m∈Z∑​δι(m)​,Pψ​(x)=m∈Z∑​ψ(x+ι(2πm)).

For every ψ∈SC(X)\psi\in\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)ψ∈SC​(X), Qψ=W([bψ])Q\psi=W([b_\psi])Qψ=W([bψ​]), where [bψ][b_\psi][bψ​] is its counting-measure L2L^2L2 class if it belongs to L2L^2L2, and zero otherwise; in fact, bψb_\psibψ​ belongs to L2L^2L2, and

∫X ⁣ ⁣−∣ψ^(u)∣2 dσcomb(u)=ofReal⁡(∥Qψ∥2).\int_X^{\!\!-}|\widehat\psi(u)|^2\,d\sigma_{\mathrm{comb}}(u) =\operatorname{ofReal}(\|Q\psi\|^2).∫X−​∣ψ​(u)∣2dσcomb​(u)=ofReal(∥Qψ∥2).

For every such ψ\psiψ and every x∈Xx\in Xx∈X, the series defining Pψ(x)P_\psi(x)Pψ​(x) is summable. Finally, for every ψ\psiψ, AψA\psiAψ is the functional ϕ↦⟨Qϕ,Qψ⟩C\phi\mapsto\langle Q\phi,Q\psi\rangle_{\mathbb C}ϕ↦⟨Qϕ,Qψ⟩C​, and for every ϕ∈SC(X)\phi\in\mathcal S_{\mathbb C}(X)ϕ∈SC​(X), the function x↦Pψ(x)ϕ(x)‾x\mapsto P_\psi(x)\overline{\phi(x)}x↦Pψ​(x)ϕ(x)​ is integrable with respect to volume and

(Aψ)(ϕ)=2π∫XPψ(x) ϕ(x)‾ dx.(A\psi)(\phi)=2\pi\int_X P_\psi(x)\,\overline{\phi(x)}\,dx.(Aψ)(ϕ)=2π∫X​Pψ​(x)ϕ(x)​dx.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me