Leopoldt's conjecture holds, at every prime p, for every number field K that is Galois over Q with Galois group of exponent dividing 2, i.e. every element σ∈G=Gal(K/Q) satisfies σ2=1:
DL(K)=0.
Equivalently, this covers all multiquadratic fields K=Q(a1,…,ak) with ai∈Q× of arbitrary signs. Such a field is Galois, hence either totally real or totally imaginary. In the totally real case this is Leopoldt's conjecture for totally real multiquadratic fields. In the totally imaginary case G is abelian, so K is a CM field whose maximal real subfield K+ is again Galois over Q with Galois group a quotient of G (so still of exponent 2) and totally real; since the Leopoldt defect of a CM field equals that of its maximal real subfield, the conjecture for K follows from that for K+.
Formalization note. No signature hypothesis is imposed; the hypotheses are IsGalois ℚ K and ∀ σ : K ≃ₐ[ℚ] K, σ * σ = 1. Any prime p is allowed.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_LeopoldtDefect
open NumberField
Formal statement
namespace Leopoldt
theorem leopoldt_multiquadratic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
(K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [IsGalois ℚ K]
(hG : ∀ σ : K ≃ₐ[ℚ] K, σ * σ = 1) :
LeopoldtConjecture p K := by sorry
end Leopoldt
Source
A. Brumer, On the units of algebraic number fields, Mathematika 14 (1967), 121-124 (Leopoldt's conjecture for abelian extensions of Q). For the elementary argument in the multiquadratic case (eigen-decomposition of the unit group under the characters of Gal(K/Q) = (Z/2)^k, with the units of the 2^k - 1 real quadratic subfields spanning a subgroup of finite index), see L. C. Washington, Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields, 2nd ed., GTM 83, Section 5.5 (Leopoldt's conjecture, Theorem 5.29) and Section 8.1 (units of abelian fields: the character decomposition of the unit group); cf. H. Hasse, Über die Klassenzahl abelscher Zahlkörper (1952) for units of multiquadratic fields. The CM case reduces to the maximal real subfield via Washington, GTM 83, Proposition 5.33 / Section 5.5 (the Leopoldt defect of a CM field equals that of K^+, since E_K^+ has finite index in E_K).