Lemma 2.8 — |A_1 ∩ ⋯ ∩ A_p| ≥ Σ|A_i| − (p − 1)|A_1 ∪ ⋯ ∪ A_p|
ProvedWangKangXue.SpectralTuran.lemma_2_8combinatoricsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1
Let and let be finite sets. Then
This elementary counting inequality is how the paper finds many common neighbours of a set of high-degree vertices inside one part, the step behind Lemmas 3.4–3.8.
Formalization Note The inequality is stated over . The hypothesis is implicit on the page (at the empty intersection is not a finite set).
Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace WangKangXue.SpectralTuran
open Classical
/-- **Lemma 2.8** (Wang–Kang–Xue, arXiv:2203.10831v1, p. 3; from Cioabă et al.). For finite sets
`A_1, …, A_p` (`p ≥ 1`),
`|A_1 ∩ ⋯ ∩ A_p| ≥ ∑_i |A_i| − (p − 1) |A_1 ∪ ⋯ ∪ A_p|`. -/
theorem lemma_2_8 {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (A : Fin p → Finset α) :
((Finset.univ.inf' ⟨⟨0, hp⟩, Finset.mem_univ _⟩ A).card : ℤ) ≥
∑ i, ((A i).card : ℤ) - ((p : ℤ) - 1) * ((Finset.univ.biUnion A).card : ℤ) := by sorry
end WangKangXue.SpectralTuran
Source
Wang, Kang, Xue, On a conjecture of spectral extremal problems, arXiv:2203.10831v1, p. 3, Lemma 2.8 (from Cioabă, Feng, Tait, Zhang)
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.