Lemma 1 — every price vector is an equilibrium for a unique partition and asset vector
ProvedCoCoNet.lemma_1contingent-capitalequilibriumfinancial-networksmatrix-analysisp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-strengthenedp2o-v1
Let be an admissible network, the thresholds and the credit amounts. For every :
- there is exactly one partition of for which some asset vector makes a -equilibrium;
- is a -equilibrium if and only if
where is the unique solution of the linear system (1)–(2) for this partition.
So the map from stock prices to asset values is well defined, and the equilibrium question becomes whether is onto (existence) or one-to-one (uniqueness).
Differences from the source:
- reading: no sign condition on the thresholds l stated → 0 ≤ l; reason: the paper asserts that the sets S_{B,C,H} partition ℝⁿ (p.12), which holds iff l ≥ 0; in the paper's setting lᵢ ≥ cᵢ/mᵢ with nonnegative debts cᵢ; without it the sets read off s overlap and Φ is not continuous
- generalization: credit amounts cᵢ are convertible debts (implicitly cᵢ ≥ 0) → c : Fin n → ℝ of any sign; reason: equations (1)–(2) and (3) are linear in c and the proof never uses c ≥ 0; nonnegative c is a special case
- encoding: a is the unique solution of the linear system (1–2) for the partition read off s → a = Phi m W l c s, the formula (3); reason: (3) is the paper's summary of (1)–(2) (p.11)
- encoding: banks [n] = {1, …, n}; vectors in ℝⁿ; matrix W = (w_ij) → banks Fin n (0-based); vectors Fin n → ℝ; W : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) ℝ with W i j = w_ij; reason: same objects, relabelled from 0
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_IsAdmissible import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_bankrupt import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_converting import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_healthy import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_IsEquilibrium import Definitions.Def_CoCoNet_Phi
Formal statement
namespace CoCoNet
/-- **Lemma 1 (every price vector is an equilibrium for exactly one partition and one asset
vector).**
Balter, Schweizer & Vera, arXiv:2011.06474v1, Lemma 1, p.10: "For every s ∈ ℝⁿ, there exist a
unique partition (B, C, H) of [n] and an asset price vector a such that (a, s) is a
(B, C, H)-equilibrium. Specifically, the partition (B, C, H) is given by B = {i|sᵢ < 0},
C = {i|0 ≤ sᵢ ≤ lᵢ} and H = {i|sᵢ > lᵢ} and the asset price vector is given by the unique
solution a to the linear system (1–2) for this partition (B, C, H)."
The first conjunct is the existence and uniqueness of the partition; the second says that
`(a, s)` is a `(B, C, H)`-equilibrium exactly when `(B, C, H)` is the partition read off `s` and
`a = Φ(s)`, the unique solution of (1–2).
**Formalization Note.** `0 ≤ l` is a reading: it is what makes the three sets read off `s` a
partition of `[n]` (p.12). -/
theorem lemma_1 {n : ℕ} (m : Fin n → ℝ) (W : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) ℝ) (l c : Fin n → ℝ)
(hadm : IsAdmissible m W) (hl : 0 ≤ l) (s : Fin n → ℝ) :
(∃! P : Finset (Fin n) × Finset (Fin n) × Finset (Fin n),
∃ a : Fin n → ℝ, IsEquilibrium m W l c a s P.1 P.2.1 P.2.2) ∧
∀ (a : Fin n → ℝ) (B C H : Finset (Fin n)),
IsEquilibrium m W l c a s B C H ↔
(B = bankrupt s ∧ C = converting l s ∧ H = healthy l s ∧ a = Phi m W l c s) := by sorry
end CoCoNet
Source
Balter, Schweizer & Vera, Contingent Capital with Stock Price Triggers in Interbank Networks, arXiv:2011.06474v1, Lemma 1, p.10
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.