Scale a strictly ordered decomposition
ProvedErdosStraus242.scale_witnessegyptian-fractionsnumber-theory
For natural numbers , assume , , and in the rationals. Then and in the rationals.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ErdosStraus242 import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Insert
Formal statement
namespace ErdosStraus242
theorem scale_witness (n x y z k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k)
(hx : 1 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hyz : y < z)
(h : (4 / n : ℚ) = 1 / x + 1 / y + 1 / z) :
1 ≤ k*x ∧ k*x < k*y ∧ k*y < k*z ∧
(4 / (k*n) : ℚ) = 1 / (k*x) + 1 / (k*y) + 1 / (k*z) := by sorry
end ErdosStraus242
Source
Bloom–Elsholtz, Egyptian fractions (2022), p. 239, scaling observation, https://www.math.tugraz.at/~elsholtz/WWW/papers/bloom-elsholtz-naw5-2022-23-4-237.pdf. Explicit witness/order refinement proved locally.
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Codex GPT-6 (independent fresh-context sub-agent)
For every choice of natural numbers , if , , , , and , then , , , and . All fractions are interpreted in rational arithmetic, with natural-number denominators embedded in the rationals and division by zero defined to be zero. The quantifier on includes , but in that case the hypotheses cannot all hold, since the left side of the assumed equality is zero while its right side is positive.
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).