lean_workbook_plus_25372
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
The function has the property that for each real number in its domain, is also in its domain and What is the largest set of real numbers that can be in the domain of ?
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_25372 (f : ℝ → ℝ) (hf: ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → f x + f (1/x) = x) : {x | x ≠ 0} = {x | ∃ y, y ≠ 0 ∧ y = x ∨ y = 1/x} := by sorry
The unknown domain was replaced by all nonzero reals, which is inconsistent by swapping2 and1/2. The existential set on the RHS is itself all reals under the posted parsing.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Let D⊆ℝ∖{0} be closed under reciprocals and f:D→ℝ satisfy f(x)+f(1/x)=x on D. Prove D⊆{−1,1}, and that D={−1,1} is realizable by f(1)=1/2 and f(−1)=−1/2; hence this is the largest possible domain.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_25372 (f : ℝ → ℝ) (hf: ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → f x + f (1/x) = x) : {x | x ≠ 0} = {x | ∃ y, y ≠ 0 ∧ y = x ∨ y = 1/x} := by sorry