Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 4, proof — interior cone point gives positive coefficients

Proved
McFadden1974.QPTest.interior_gives_positive_coefficients

by mikedeng1 · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conditional-logitconvex-geometrylinear-optimizationp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let CCC be the convex cone generated by the vectors wnij=Sin(zjn−zin)w_{nij}=S_{in}(z_{jn}-z_{in})wnij​=Sin​(zjn​−zin​). If zero lies in the interior of CCC, then strictly positive scalars can represent zero:

∃αijn>0∑n,i,jαijnwnij=0.\exists\alpha_{ijn}>0\quad\sum_{n,i,j}\alpha_{ijn}w_{nij}=0.∃αijn​>0n,i,j∑​αijn​wnij​=0.

The scalars can be rescaled so that every coefficient is at least one. Thus the quadratic program (22) attains a minimum of zero. This is the constructive half of the cone argument in Lemma 4.

Formalization Note The representation includes all ordered pairs, even those with zero weighted difference.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_McFadden1974_QPTest_ChoiceData

set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
namespace McFadden1974.QPTest

/-- McFadden (1974), p. 117 (PDF 13), Lemma 4, proof, second paragraph.
If zero is interior to the generated cone, a strictly positive coefficient
exists for every ordered index triple, yielding zero; rescaling those
coefficients gives a feasible zero of (22). The paper's abbreviated sum is
read with the `i,j` sums present, as required by equation (22). -/
theorem interior_gives_positive_coefficients {N K : ℕ} (d : ChoiceData N K)
    (h : (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin K)) ∈ interior d.coneSet) :
    (∃ α : (n : Fin N) → Fin (d.J n) → Fin (d.J n) → ℝ,
      (∀ n i j, 0 < α n i j) ∧
        (∑ n, ∑ i, ∑ j, α n i j • d.w n i j) = 0) ∧
      IsLeast ((fun y : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin K) => ‖y‖ ^ 2) '' d.qpFeasible) 0 := by sorry

end McFadden1974.QPTest
Source
McFadden, Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press (1974), p. 117, Lemma 4, proof, second paragraph (PDF p. 13)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 5, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me