lean_workbook_plus_63923
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Actually, negative solutions don't exist, as for , always lies in the set for all natural . Neither 39 nor 68 are in this set.
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_63923 : ¬ (∃ x : ℝ, x * Int.floor x = 39) ∧ ¬ (∃ x : ℝ, x * Int.floor x = 68) := by sorry
Restrict each asserted nonexistence to x<0, as the prose specifies.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Restrict each asserted nonexistence to x<0, as the prose specifies.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_63923 : ¬ (∃ x : ℝ, x * Int.floor x = 39) ∧ ¬ (∃ x : ℝ, x * Int.floor x = 68) := by sorry