Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Forgetting a complete instrument’s outcome preserves monotonicity

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P36.forgetting_outcome

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let SSS be a real-valued function on normalized finite-dimensional no-signaling assemblages, across all positive dimensions and finite nonempty alphabets. Suppose SSS is convex and obeys strong monotonicity for every complete Bob-to-Alice 1W-LOCC instrument: ∑wpwS(ρw)≤S(ρ)\sum_wp_wS(\rho_w)\le S(\rho)∑w​pw​S(ρw​)≤S(ρ), where pwp_wpw​ is the outcome probability and ρw=Mw(ρ)/pw\rho_w=M_w(\rho)/p_wρw​=Mw​(ρ)/pw​ when pw>0p_w>0pw​>0; zero-probability terms contribute zero. For every such complete instrument,

S ⁣(∑wMw(ρ))≤S(ρ).S\!\left(\sum_wM_w(\rho)\right)\le S(\rho).S(w∑​Mw​(ρ))≤S(ρ).

This is monotonicity of the deterministic output after the outcome is forgotten. It relates the average and unflagged versions of the resource monotonicity condition.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P36
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators ENNReal ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P36

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

variable {d r s df rf sf m : ℕ}

/-- Section V, PDF p.5: average monotonicity plus convexity implies monotonicity
when a complete instrument's outcome is forgotten. This does not assert
monotonicity after conditioning on an arbitrary stochastic success event. -/
theorem forgetting_outcome (S : SteeringMeasure) (hmono : StrongMonotonicity S)
    (hconv : MeasureConvexity S) (P : SteeringProtocol d r s df rf sf m)
    (hcomplete : P.Complete) (rho : AssemblageBlocks d r s) (hrho : IsNormalized rho) :
    S df rf sf (protocolAction P rho) ≤ S d r s rho := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P36

end
Source
The resource theory of steering, arXiv:1409.5804v3, PDF p. 5, Section V, Definition 2 and following paragraph
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let SSS assign a real number Sd,r,s(F)S_{d,r,s}(F)Sd,r,s​(F) to every family F=(Fa,x)a<r, x<sF=(F_{a,x})_{a<r,\ x<s}F=(Fa,x​)a<r, x<s​ of complex d×dd\times dd×d matrices, for every natural d,r,sd,r,sd,r,s. Call such a family normalized when d,r,s>0d,r,s>0d,r,s>0, its blocks are positive semidefinite, its outcome sums are setting-independent, and μ(F)=Re⁡tr⁡(s−1∑x,aFa,x)=1\mu(F)=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(s^{-1}\sum_{x,a}F_{a,x})=1μ(F)=Retr(s−1∑x,a​Fa,x​)=1. Assume the following two properties of SSS: for every normalized FFF and every complete protocol in any dimensions, with branch families R(w)R^{(w)}R(w) and branch probabilities pwp_wpw​, one has ∑wbw≤Sd,r,s(F)\sum_w b_w\leq S_{d,r,s}(F)∑w​bw​≤Sd,r,s​(F), where bw=pwSdf,rf,sf(R(w)/μ(R(w)))b_w=p_wS_{d_f,r_f,s_f}(R^{(w)}/\mu(R^{(w)}))bw​=pw​Sdf​,rf​,sf​​(R(w)/μ(R(w))) if pw>0p_w>0pw​>0 and bw=0b_w=0bw​=0 otherwise; and for all normalized F,HF,HF,H of the same dimensions and every real t∈[0,1]t\in[0,1]t∈[0,1], Sd,r,s(tF+(1−t)H)≤tSd,r,s(F)+(1−t)Sd,r,s(H)S_{d,r,s}(tF+(1-t)H)\leq tS_{d,r,s}(F)+(1-t)S_{d,r,s}(H)Sd,r,s​(tF+(1−t)H)≤tSd,r,s​(F)+(1−t)Sd,r,s​(H). Here a protocol has positive input and output dimensions, finitely many matrices KwK_wKw​ with I−∑wKw†Kw⪰0I-\sum_wK_w^\dagger K_w\succeq0I−∑w​Kw†​Kw​⪰0, probability distributions αw(x∣xf)\alpha_w(x\mid x_f)αw​(x∣xf​) and βw(af∣a,x,xf)\beta_w(a_f\mid a,x,x_f)βw​(af​∣a,x,xf​) over xxx and afa_faf​, respectively, and

Raf,xf(w)=∑x,aαw(x∣xf)βw(af∣a,x,xf)KwFa,xKw†,pw=Re⁡tr⁡(KwB(F)Kw†).R^{(w)}_{a_f,x_f} =\sum_{x,a}\alpha_w(x\mid x_f)\beta_w(a_f\mid a,x,x_f)K_wF_{a,x}K_w^\dagger, \qquad p_w=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(K_wB(F)K_w^\dagger).Raf​,xf​(w)​=x,a∑​αw​(x∣xf​)βw​(af​∣a,x,xf​)Kw​Fa,x​Kw†​,pw​=Retr(Kw​B(F)Kw†​).

Completeness means ∑wKw†Kw=I\sum_wK_w^\dagger K_w=I∑w​Kw†​Kw​=I. Then for every such complete protocol PPP with natural parameters d,r,s,df,rf,sf,md,r,s,d_f,r_f,s_f,md,r,s,df​,rf​,sf​,m and every normalized input ρ\rhoρ, its outcome-forgotten output R=∑w<mR(w)R=\sum_{w<m}R^{(w)}R=∑w<m​R(w) satisfies Sdf,rf,sf(R)≤Sd,r,s(ρ)S_{d_f,r_f,s_f}(R)\leq S_{d,r,s}(\rho)Sdf​,rf​,sf​​(R)≤Sd,r,s​(ρ). No nonnegativity or hidden-state vanishing property of SSS is assumed.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me