lean_workbook_plus_53886
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let ,prove that:
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_53886 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, a ≥ 0 ∧ b ≥ 0 ∧ c ≥ 0 ∧ a + b + c + a * b * c = 4 → a / (b + c * a + a * b * c) + b / (c + a * b + a * b * c) + c / (a + b * c + a * b * c) ≥ 1 := by sorry
The source nonnegative domain permits undefined ordinary fractions, which totalized division evaluates at the accepted (4,0,0).
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Require the three denominators positive, or use strictly positive a,b,c, before asserting the source inequality.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_53886 : ∀ a b c : ℝ, a ≥ 0 ∧ b ≥ 0 ∧ c ≥ 0 ∧ a + b + c + a * b * c = 4 → a / (b + c * a + a * b * c) + b / (c + a * b + a * b * c) + c / (a + b * c + a * b * c) ≥ 1 := by sorry