Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 4.2 — Augmented Greedy recovers a (1−1/e)(1-1/e)(1−1/e) fraction of complete-type revenue

Proved
CustAssort.AugGreedy.theorem_4_2

by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

approximation-algorithmassortment-optimizationgreedy-algorithmmultinomial-logitp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1submodular

Consider CAP with positive product revenues ordered from highest to lowest, nonnegative MNL preference weights, and nonnegative type-arrival probabilities summing to one. Let S∗S^*S∗ be an optimal first-stage assortment under capacity KKK. For customer types CCC, products PPP, and any k≥∣P∩S∗∣k\ge|P\cap S^*|k≥∣P∩S∗∣, let Δ\DeltaΔ be any output of Augmented Greedy on C,kC,kC,k. A type is complete with respect to PPP when every product of P∩S∗P\cap S^*P∩S∗ belongs to its threshold optimal personalized assortment. Write CPC_PCP​ for the complete types in CCC. Then

fC(Δ)≥(1−1/e) fCP(P∩S∗).f^C(\Delta)\ge(1-1/e)\,f^{C_P}(P\cap S^*).fC(Δ)≥(1−1/e)fCP​(P∩S∗).

This structural bound is the paper's guarantee for Augmented Greedy and a building block for its later CAP approximation results.

Formalization Note The theorem covers every legal Greedy run and every tie-breaking choice of Augmented Greedy. The threshold optimal assortment is {i∈S∗:ri≥fj(S∗)}\{i\in S^*:r_i\ge f_j(S^*)\}{i∈S∗:ri​≥fj​(S∗)}, as in Lemma E.1. kkk is independent of KKK.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_CustAssort_AugGreedy_Setting
Formal statement
namespace CustAssort.AugGreedy

/-- Theorem 4.2, p. 11: Augmented Greedy captures a 1−1/e fraction of complete-type revenue. -/
theorem theorem_4_2 {n m : ℕ} (θ : Fin m → ℝ) (v : Fin n → Fin m → ℝ)
    (r : Fin n → ℝ) (hr : ∀ i, 0 < r i) (hv : ∀ i j, 0 ≤ v i j)
    (hθ : ∀ j, 0 ≤ θ j) (hθsum : ∑ j, θ j = 1) (hanti : Antitone r)
    (K : ℕ) (Sstar : Finset (Fin n)) (hS : IsCAPOpt θ v r K Sstar)
    (C : Finset (Fin m)) (P : Finset (Fin n)) (k : ℕ)
    (hk : (P ∩ Sstar).card ≤ k) (Δ : Finset (Fin n))
    (hΔ : IsAugGreedyOutput θ v r C k Δ) :
    (1 - Real.exp (-1)) *
      fC θ v r (completeTypes v r Sstar C P) (P ∩ Sstar) ≤ fC θ v r C Δ := by sorry

end CustAssort.AugGreedy
Source
El Housni & Topaloglu, Joint Assortment Optimization and Customization under a Mixture of Multinomial Logit Models: Value of Personalized Assortments, SSRN 3830082, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3830082 (version of December 7, 2021), Definition 4.1 and Theorem 4.2, p. 11; proof pp. 11–12
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 9, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me