Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The cyclic candidate KpK_pKp​ is a necessary lower bound in dimension at least three

Proved
HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction.cyclicConstant_le_of_complex_constant

by savarin · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

complex-schatten-normdimension-independenthlawka-schattennecessary-boundsharp-constant

Let n≥3n\ge3n≥3 be a natural number and p>1p>1p>1 a real exponent. Consider the coordinate ℓp\ell^pℓp-norm on nnn-tuples of complex numbers, ∥x∥p=(∑i=1n∣xi∣p)1/p\|x\|_p = \bigl(\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p\bigr)^{1/p}∥x∥p​=(∑i=1n​∣xi​∣p)1/p for x∈Cnx\in\mathbb C^nx∈Cn. For x,y,z∈Cnx,y,z\in\mathbb C^nx,y,z∈Cn, call

pairGap(x,y)=∥x∥p+∥y∥p−∥x+y∥p\mathrm{pairGap}(x,y)=\|x\|_p+\|y\|_p-\|x+y\|_ppairGap(x,y)=∥x∥p​+∥y∥p​−∥x+y∥p​

the pair deficit, tripleGap(x,y,z)=∥x∥p+∥y∥p+∥z∥p−∥x+y+z∥p\mathrm{tripleGap}(x,y,z)=\|x\|_p+\|y\|_p+\|z\|_p-\|x+y+z\|_ptripleGap(x,y,z)=∥x∥p​+∥y∥p​+∥z∥p​−∥x+y+z∥p​ the triple deficit, and pairGapSum(x,y,z)\mathrm{pairGapSum}(x,y,z)pairGapSum(x,y,z) the sum of the three pair deficits over the pairs {x,y},{x,z},{y,z}\{x,y\},\{x,z\},\{y,z\}{x,y},{x,z},{y,z}. Call a real number CCC an admissible Hlawka constant for ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ on Cn\mathbb C^nCn when

tripleGap(x,y,z)  ≤  C⋅pairGapSum(x,y,z)\mathrm{tripleGap}(x,y,z)\;\le\;C\cdot\mathrm{pairGapSum}(x,y,z)tripleGap(x,y,z)≤C⋅pairGapSum(x,y,z)

holds for all x,y,z∈Cnx,y,z\in\mathbb C^nx,y,z∈Cn. Let

Rp(t)  =  3Ap(t)−31/p∣2−t∣6Ap(t)−3Bp(t),Ap(t)=(tp+2)1/p, Bp(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/p,R_p(t) \;=\; \frac{3A_p(t)-3^{1/p}|2-t|}{6A_p(t)-3B_p(t)}, \qquad A_p(t)=(t^p+2)^{1/p},\ B_p(t)=(2|1-t|^p+2^p)^{1/p},Rp​(t)=6Ap​(t)−3Bp​(t)3Ap​(t)−31/p∣2−t∣​,Ap​(t)=(tp+2)1/p, Bp​(t)=(2∣1−t∣p+2p)1/p,

be the cyclic ratio (for t≥0t\ge0t≥0, Ap(t)A_p(t)Ap​(t) is the coordinate ppp-norm of each of (−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t)∈R3(-t,1,1),(1,-t,1),(1,1,-t)\in\mathbb R^3(−t,1,1),(1,−t,1),(1,1,−t)∈R3 and Bp(t)B_p(t)Bp​(t) that of each of their pairwise sums), and let

Kp  =  sup⁡{ Rp(t):1/2≤t≤2 }K_p \;=\; \sup\{\,R_p(t) : 1/2\le t\le2\,\}Kp​=sup{Rp​(t):1/2≤t≤2}

be the cyclic candidate constant.

The theorem states: if CCC is any admissible Hlawka constant for ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ on Cn\mathbb C^nCn with n≥3n\ge3n≥3, then

Kp  ≤  C.K_p \;\le\; C.Kp​≤C.

This is the necessity half of sharpness for the diagonal construction. A separate theorem shows KpK_pKp​ is itself admissible for complex diagonal triples in every finite dimension, for every real p≥256p\ge256p≥256. Combining the two: for p≥256p\ge256p≥256, KpK_pKp​ is the sharp dimension-independent Hlawka constant for ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ on Cn\mathbb C^nCn, n≥3n\ge3n≥3; this theorem alone, valid for every real p>1p>1p>1, only shows that no constant smaller than KpK_pKp​ can work, and does not by itself establish admissibility or exact sharpness outside the range where the companion theorem is proved.

Formalization Note. This theorem is stated for the coordinate norm ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ on Cn\mathbb C^nCn directly. A separate theorem (schattenPNorm_diagonal) identifies ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p∥⋅∥p​ with the Schatten ppp-norm of a diagonal operator on Cn\mathbb C^nCn; that identification is not needed to state or prove this theorem.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_DiagonalConstruction_Basic
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_DiagonalConstruction_Cyclic
import Definitions.Def_HlawkaSchatten_GapComparison
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Compact

/-
Copyright (c) 2026 Ezzeri Esa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ezzeri Esa
-/

/-!
# Cyclic witnesses and the necessary lower bound

The three cyclic vectors have equal norms and their ratio is the scalar
formula defining the comparison constant. Zero padding preserves all seven
norms, so the lower bound holds in every dimension at least three.
-/

open HlawkaSchatten
open HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction
Formal statement
theorem HlawkaSchatten.DiagonalConstruction.cyclicConstant_le_of_complex_constant {p C : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p)
    {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 ≤ n)
    (hC : HasHlawkaConstant (lpNorm p : (Fin n → ℂ) → ℝ) C) :
    cyclicConstant p ≤ C := by sorry
Source
https://github.com/savarin/hlawka-schatten/blob/79aa498bfcf7b22bd91d771fb32ec278e2d4704b/HlawkaSchatten/DiagonalConstruction/CyclicWitness.lean#L111-L119
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 29, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by savarin · Sep 29, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

  • Endorsed by marwahaha · Sep 30, 2026

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me