Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Massless particles: Erel=pcE_{\mathrm{rel}} = pcErel​=pc

Proved
MassEnergyEquivalence.massless_energy_eq_pc

by Lucas · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

mathematical-physicsspecial-relativity

Let c>0c>0c>0, and let E≥0E\ge 0E≥0 and p≥0p\ge 0p≥0 be the energy and momentum magnitude of a particle satisfying the energy–momentum relation E2−(pc)2=(m0c2)2E^2-(pc)^2=(m_0c^2)^2E2−(pc)2=(m0​c2)2 with rest mass m0=0m_0=0m0​=0. Then

E=pc.E = pc .E=pc.

For photons, which have zero rest mass, the energy–momentum relation thus reduces to Erel=pcE_{\mathrm{rel}}=pcErel​=pc: their energy is due only to their momentum.

Formalization Note A massless particle travels at speed ccc, where the Lorentz factor is undefined, so it cannot be described by the velocity-based quantities γmc2\gamma m c^2γmc2, γmv\gamma m\mathbf vγmv of the definition file (with m=0m=0m=0 those would both vanish). The statement is therefore phrased directly in terms of a pair (E,p)(E,p)(E,p) satisfying the energy–momentum relation with m0=0m_0=0m0​=0.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MassEnergyEquivalence_Defs

open MassEnergyEquivalence Filter Asymptotics Topology
Formal statement
namespace MassEnergyEquivalence

theorem massless_energy_eq_pc (c E p : ℝ) (hc : 0 < c) (hE : 0 ≤ E) (hp : 0 ≤ p)
    (h : E ^ 2 - (p * c) ^ 2 = ((0 : ℝ) * c ^ 2) ^ 2) :
    E = p * c := by sorry

end MassEnergyEquivalence
Source
Wikipedia, *Mass–energy equivalence*, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence (PDF snapshot supplied by the proposer, 25 pp.), §Extension for systems in motion (p. 6): "For photons where m0=0m_0 = 0m0​=0, the equation reduces to Erel=pcE_{\mathrm{rel}} = pcErel​=pc"; §Mass in special relativity (p. 2): massless particles' energy is due only to their momentum.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind

Disclosure — this is NOT a blind read-back. It was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted this Lean statement, with full knowledge of the source material and of the intended meaning. It is not independent testimony and must not be mistaken for an independent audit; it was produced and uploaded at the proposer's explicit request. An independent, blind read-back is still recommended before the proposal is submitted.

For all real c,E,pc, E, pc,E,p with c>0c>0c>0, E≥0E\ge0E≥0, p≥0p\ge0p≥0, if

E2−(pc)2=(0⋅c2)2 (=0),E^2 - (p c)^2 = (0\cdot c^2)^2\ (=0),E2−(pc)2=(0⋅c2)2 (=0),

then E=pcE = p cE=pc. The statement involves no definitions from the mission's definition file; EEE and ppp are free real numbers subject only to the listed hypotheses.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me