Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Step (ii): the layers form k allocations and partition each bundle

Proved
ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding.layers_partition

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

approximation-algorithmscombinatorial-auctionsp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let σ=(S1,…,Sn)\sigma=(S_1,\dots,S_n)σ=(S1​,…,Sn​) be a preallocation in which every item appears in at most kkk of the bundles, and let SirS_i^rSir​ be the layers (SirS_i^rSir​ consists of the items of SiS_iSi​ that appear in exactly r−1r-1r−1 of S1,…,Si−1S_1,\dots,S_{i-1}S1​,…,Si−1​). Then:

  1. for every 1≤r≤k1\le r\le k1≤r≤k the bundles S1r,…,SnrS_1^r,\dots,S_n^rS1r​,…,Snr​ are pairwise disjoint, so they form a valid allocation;
  2. for every bidder iii,
Si=⋃r=1kSir;S_i=\bigcup_{r=1}^{k} S_i^r;Si​=r=1⋃k​Sir​;
  1. for every bidder iii and indices r≠r′r\ne r'r=r′ with r,r′≥1r,r'\ge1r,r′≥1, the layers SirS_i^rSir​ and Sir′S_i^{r'}Sir′​ are disjoint.

Thus each SiS_iSi​ is the disjoint union of its kkk layers, and each layer index yields a feasible allocation. This is step (ii) of the proof of Theorem 3.1.

Formalization Note Parts 1 and 3 hold for any preallocation; the count bound is what makes kkk layers enough to cover SiS_iSi​ in part 2.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Auction
import Definitions.Def_ComplementFreeCA_CFRounding_Algorithm
Formal statement
namespace ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding

theorem layers_partition {n m : ℕ} (σ : Fin n → Finset (Fin m)) (k : ℕ)
    (hcount : ∀ j, count σ j ≤ k) :
    (∀ r : ℕ, 1 ≤ r → r ≤ k → IsAllocation (fun i => layer σ i r)) ∧
    (∀ i : Fin n, σ i = (Finset.Icc 1 k).biUnion (fun r => layer σ i r)) ∧
    (∀ (i : Fin n) (r r' : ℕ), 1 ≤ r → 1 ≤ r' → r ≠ r' →
      Disjoint (layer σ i r) (layer σ i r')) := by sorry

end ComplementFreeCA.CFRounding
Source
Dobzinski, Nisan, Schapira, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders, Math. Oper. Res. 35(1), 2010, p. 6, §3.1, proof of Theorem 3.1, step (ii); construction of p. 5, algorithm step (ii)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me