Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 9.b — φ is less convex than 𝒬 ⟺ its dual is more convex than 𝒬 ⟺ φ is a prox primitive

Proved
MoreauProx.Characterization.prox_primitive_tfae

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conjugate-dualityconvex-analysisp2o-batch-p100bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1proximal-map

Let HHH be a real Hilbert space, Q(z)=12∥z∥2\mathcal{Q}(z) = \tfrac12\|z\|^2Q(z)=21​∥z∥2, and φ:H→[−∞,+∞]\varphi : H \to [-\infty, +\infty]φ:H→[−∞,+∞]. The following three properties are equivalent:

  1. φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi \in \Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H) and φ\varphiφ is less convex than Q\mathcal{Q}Q;
  2. φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi \in \Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H) and the dual function of φ\varphiφ is more convex than Q\mathcal{Q}Q;
  3. φ\varphiφ is the primitive of a prox map: there is g∈Γ0(H)g \in \Gamma_0(H)g∈Γ0​(H) such that, with fff the dual function of ggg,
φ(z)=12∥prox⁡gz∥2+f(prox⁡fz)for all z∈H.\varphi(z) = \tfrac12 \|\operatorname{prox}_g z\|^2 + f(\operatorname{prox}_f z) \quad \text{for all } z \in H.φ(z)=21​∥proxg​z∥2+f(proxf​z)for all z∈H.

The proposition describes the primitives of prox maps intrinsically, without reference to ggg. Together with Proposition 10.b it reduces the characterization of prox maps (Corollary 10.c) to a statement about subgradients.

Formalization Note The equivalence is stated as List.TFAE. Property 3 does not itself assume φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi \in \Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H), as in the paper; "less/more convex than Q\mathcal{Q}Q" uses an auxiliary convex function with values in ]−∞,+∞]]-\infty, +\infty]]−∞,+∞] (Définition 9.b).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MoreauProx_Characterization_ConvexityVsQ
open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace MoreauProx.Characterization

theorem prox_primitive_tfae {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace ℝ H] [CompleteSpace H] (φ : H → EReal) :
    List.TFAE
      [GammaZero φ ∧ LessConvexThanQ φ,
       GammaZero φ ∧ MoreConvexThanQ (conj φ),
       IsProxPrimitive φ] := by sorry

end MoreauProx.Characterization
Source
Moreau, Proximité et dualité dans un espace hilbertien, Bull. Soc. Math. France 93 (1965), p. 288, Définition 9.b; p. 289, Proposition 9.b
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Let HHH be a real Hilbert space and let φ:H→[−∞,+∞]\varphi:H\to[-\infty,+\infty]φ:H→[−∞,+∞] be arbitrary, with no hypotheses. The statement asserts that the following three conditions are equivalent.

  1. φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi\in\Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H), and there is a γ\gammaγ with the following properties: γ\gammaγ never takes the value −∞-\infty−∞, has a convex real epigraph, and satisfies φ(z)+γ(z)=12∥z∥2\varphi(z)+\gamma(z)=\frac12\|z\|^2φ(z)+γ(z)=21​∥z∥2 for all zzz. Under the [−∞,+∞][-\infty,+\infty][−∞,+∞] addition rules, this forces φ\varphiφ and γ\gammaγ to be finite everywhere, so the condition means that 12∥⋅∥2−φ\frac12\|\cdot\|^2-\varphi21​∥⋅∥2−φ is a real convex function.
  2. φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi\in\Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H), and there is a γ\gammaγ that never takes the value −∞-\infty−∞, has a convex real epigraph (the value +∞+\infty+∞ is allowed), and satisfies
φ∗(y)=12∥y∥2+γ(y)for all y,where φ∗(y)=sup⁡x(⟨x,y⟩−φ(x)).\varphi^*(y)=\tfrac12\|y\|^2+\gamma(y)\quad\text{for all }y,\qquad\text{where }\varphi^*(y)=\sup_x\big(\langle x,y\rangle-\varphi(x)\big).φ∗(y)=21​∥y∥2+γ(y)for all y,where φ∗(y)=xsup​(⟨x,y⟩−φ(x)).
  1. There is a g∈Γ0(H)g\in\Gamma_0(H)g∈Γ0​(H) such that, for every zzz,
φ(z)=12∥prox⁡g(z)∥2+re⁡(g∗(prox⁡g∗(z))).\varphi(z)=\tfrac12\|\operatorname{prox}_g(z)\|^2+\operatorname{re}\big(g^*(\operatorname{prox}_{g^*}(z))\big).φ(z)=21​∥proxg​(z)∥2+re(g∗(proxg∗​(z))).

Here prox⁡h(z)\operatorname{prox}_h(z)proxh​(z) is a chosen minimizer of u↦12∥u−z∥2+h(u)u\mapsto\frac12\|u-z\|^2+h(u)u↦21​∥u−z∥2+h(u) (or 000 if none exists), and re⁡(±∞)=0\operatorname{re}(\pm\infty)=0re(±∞)=0.

Membership in Γ0(H)\Gamma_0(H)Γ0​(H) means: never −∞-\infty−∞, finite somewhere, convex real epigraph, and lower semicontinuous.

Degenerate cases.

  • Condition 3 does not explicitly require φ∈Γ0(H)\varphi\in\Gamma_0(H)φ∈Γ0​(H); the equivalence asserts that it follows.
  • If H={0}H=\{0\}H={0}, condition 1 holds exactly when φ(0)\varphi(0)φ(0) is real. The equivalence then claims the same for conditions 2 and 3.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me