An algebraic forces an algebraic multiple of into
ProvedDiazModulus.recip_pi_log_of_pi_im_algebraiclogarithmsnumber-theorytranscendence
Let with algebraic, and suppose is not a rational multiple of but is algebraic. Then there is an algebraic with algebraic.
This is the exact analogue, for the degenerate case , of the published DiazModulus.recip_pi_log_of_period_aligned, which carries the same conclusion under the period-aligned hypothesis with .
The proof is shorter than the aligned one, because no period translate is involved: with one has , so is algebraic, and is the required since .
Together with DiazModulus.recip_pi_not_log this closes the leaf DiazModulus.diaz_of_exp_not_real_irrational_angle_period_free_pi_im_algebraic.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus open Complex ComplexConjugate
Formal statement
namespace DiazModulus
theorem recip_pi_log_of_pi_im_algebraic :
∀ u : ℂ, (¬ ∃ q : ℚ, u.im = (q : ℝ) * Real.pi) →
IsAlgebraic ℚ ((Real.pi * u.im : ℝ) : ℂ) →
IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp u) →
∃ γ : ℂ, IsAlgebraic ℚ γ ∧ γ ≠ 0 ∧
IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (γ / (((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ) * Complex.I))) := by sorry
end DiazModulusSource
The r = 0 route lemma for the period-free / pi-Im-algebraic leaf; analogue of DiazModulus.recip_pi_log_of_period_aligned.