Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Spectral theory of asymptotic operators on the circle

Proved
AsymptoticOperator.spectral_theory

by Mazecto · Oct 9, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

asymptotic-operatorconley-zehnder-indexspectral-theorysymplectic-geometryunbounded-operator

Let S:S1→R2n×2nS:S^1\to\mathbb{R}^{2n\times2n}S:S1→R2n×2n be continuous with S(t)T=S(t)S(t)^{\mathsf T}=S(t)S(t)T=S(t) for all ttt, and let AS=−J0∂t−SA_S=-J_0\partial_t-SAS​=−J0​∂t​−S with domain W1,2(S1,R2n)W^{1,2}(S^1,\mathbb{R}^{2n})W1,2(S1,R2n). Then:

  1. ASA_SAS​ is self-adjoint on L2(S1,R2n)L^2(S^1,\mathbb{R}^{2n})L2(S1,R2n);
  2. L2(S1,R2n)L^2(S^1,\mathbb{R}^{2n})L2(S1,R2n) has an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of ASA_SAS​ in W1,2W^{1,2}W1,2, with real eigenvalues of finite multiplicity accumulating only at ±∞\pm\infty±∞;
  3. for the fundamental solution Ψ\PsiΨ (Ψ(0)=Id\Psi(0)=\mathrm{Id}Ψ(0)=Id, Ψ′=J0SΨ\Psi'=J_0S\PsiΨ′=J0​SΨ), ker⁡AS≅ker⁡(Ψ(1)−Id)\ker A_S\cong\ker(\Psi(1)-\mathrm{Id})kerAS​≅ker(Ψ(1)−Id).

These are the basic analytic properties of the operator through which periodic orbits enter the Fredholm theory of Cauchy–Riemann operators.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_AsymptoticOperator_Setting
Formal statement
namespace AsymptoticOperator

open ConleyZehnder

/-- Spectral theory of the asymptotic operator: for a loop `S` of symmetric matrices,
`A_S = -J₀ ∂ₜ - S` with domain `W^{1,2}` is self-adjoint, `L²(S¹, ℝ²ⁿ)` has an
orthonormal eigenbasis whose real eigenvalues have finite multiplicity and accumulate
only at `±∞`, and `ker A_S ≅ ker(Ψ(1) - Id)` for the fundamental solution `Ψ`. -/
theorem spectral_theory {n : ℕ} (S : C(UnitAddCircle, Mat n)) (hS : IsSymLoop S) :
    IsSelfAdjoint (asymptoticOperator S) ∧ HasDiscreteEigenbasis (asymptoticOperator S) ∧
      ∀ Ψ : ℝ → Mat n, IsFundamentalSolution S Ψ →
        Nonempty (eigenspace (asymptoticOperator S) 0 ≃ₗ[ℝ]
          LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' (Ψ 1 - 1))) := by sorry

end AsymptoticOperator
Source
Wendl, Lectures on Symplectic Field Theory, arXiv:1612.01009, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01009, §3.2, equation (3.4), p. 46; §3.4, Exercise 3.29 and p. 61; Hofer-Wysocki-Zehnder, Properties of pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectisations II, GAFA 5 (1995) 270-328, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01895669, Section 3, p. 285, equation (35) and the paragraph after it (n = 1)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Setting. Let n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}n∈N be arbitrary (n=0n = 0n=0 is allowed). Let I={1,…,n}⊔{1,…,n}I = \{1,\dots,n\} \sqcup \{1,\dots,n\}I={1,…,n}⊔{1,…,n} (a first and a second copy), Vn=RI≅R2nV_n = \mathbb{R}^I \cong \mathbb{R}^{2n}Vn​=RI≅R2n with the standard Euclidean inner product, and Matn\mathrm{Mat}_nMatn​ the real I×II \times II×I (i.e. 2n×2n2n \times 2n2n×2n) matrices, with identity Id\mathrm{Id}Id. In block form with respect to the two copies, J0=(0−IdnIdn0)J_0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -\mathrm{Id}_n \\ \mathrm{Id}_n & 0 \end{pmatrix}J0​=(0Idn​​−Idn​0​). Let T=R/Z\mathbb{T} = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}T=R/Z with its Haar probability measure dtdtdt (total mass 111); for t∈Rt \in \mathbb{R}t∈R write [t][t][t] for its class in T\mathbb{T}T. Let H=L2(T,Vn)H = L^2(\mathbb{T}, V_n)H=L2(T,Vn​) be the real Hilbert space of a.e.-classes of square-integrable functions, with ⟨f,g⟩=∫T⟨f(t),g(t)⟩ dt\langle f, g \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{T}} \langle f(t), g(t) \rangle \, dt⟨f,g⟩=∫T​⟨f(t),g(t)⟩dt. For n=0n = 0n=0, V0={0}V_0 = \{0\}V0​={0} and H={0}H = \{0\}H={0}.

For f∈Hf \in Hf∈H (any representative) and k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}k∈Z, the Fourier coefficient is the vector f^k=∫Te−2πiktf(t) dt∈CI\hat f_k = \int_{\mathbb{T}} e^{-2\pi i k t} f(t)\, dt \in \mathbb{C}^If^​k​=∫T​e−2πiktf(t)dt∈CI, where f(t)f(t)f(t) is regarded as a complex vector componentwise; for a continuous map S:T→MatnS : \mathbb{T} \to \mathrm{Mat}_nS:T→Matn​, (Sf)^k=∫Te−2πiktS(t)f(t) dt∈CI\widehat{(Sf)}_k = \int_{\mathbb{T}} e^{-2\pi i k t} S(t) f(t)\, dt \in \mathbb{C}^I(Sf)​k​=∫T​e−2πiktS(t)f(t)dt∈CI (with S(t)S(t)S(t) regarded as a complex matrix). These are Bochner integrals (which by convention are 000 when the integrand is not integrable). Say f∈W1,2f \in W^{1,2}f∈W1,2 if the family ((1+k2)∑i∈I∣(f^k)i∣2)k∈Z\big((1 + k^2) \sum_{i \in I} |(\hat f_k)_i|^2\big)_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}((1+k2)∑i∈I​∣(f^​k​)i​∣2)k∈Z​ is summable. Let GS⊆H×HG_S \subseteq H \times HGS​⊆H×H be the set of pairs (f,g)(f, g)(f,g) with f∈W1,2f \in W^{1,2}f∈W1,2 and

g^k=−2πik J0f^k−(Sf)^kfor all k∈Z.\hat g_k = -2\pi i k \, J_0 \hat f_k - \widehat{(Sf)}_k \quad \text{for all } k \in \mathbb{Z}.g^​k​=−2πikJ0​f^​k​−(Sf)​k​for all k∈Z.

The operator ASA_SAS​ is defined as follows: if there exists a partially defined linear map on HHH (a linear subspace D⊆HD \subseteq HD⊆H and a linear map T:D→HT : D \to HT:D→H) whose graph {(x,Tx):x∈D}\{(x, Tx) : x \in D\}{(x,Tx):x∈D} equals GSG_SGS​, then ASA_SAS​ is such a map, chosen by the axiom of choice (its domain D(AS)D(A_S)D(AS​) is then {f:∃g, (f,g)∈GS}\{f : \exists g,\ (f,g) \in G_S\}{f:∃g, (f,g)∈GS​} and ASfA_S fAS​f is the corresponding ggg); if no such map exists, ASA_SAS​ is the zero map with domain all of HHH. The statement does not itself assert which case occurs.

Self-adjointness. For a partially defined linear map AAA on HHH with domain D(A)D(A)D(A), its adjoint A∗A^*A∗ has domain D(A∗)={y∈H:x↦⟨y,Ax⟩ is continuous on D(A)}D(A^*) = \{ y \in H : x \mapsto \langle y, Ax \rangle \text{ is continuous on } D(A) \}D(A∗)={y∈H:x↦⟨y,Ax⟩ is continuous on D(A)}; if D(A)D(A)D(A) is dense in HHH, A∗yA^* yA∗y is the unique z∈Hz \in Hz∈H with ⟨z,x⟩=⟨y,Ax⟩\langle z, x \rangle = \langle y, Ax \rangle⟨z,x⟩=⟨y,Ax⟩ for all x∈D(A)x \in D(A)x∈D(A), and if D(A)D(A)D(A) is not dense, A∗A^*A∗ is by convention the zero map on D(A∗)D(A^*)D(A∗). "AAA is self-adjoint" means A∗=AA^* = AA∗=A as partially defined maps: D(A∗)=D(A)D(A^*) = D(A)D(A∗)=D(A) and A∗y=AyA^* y = A yA∗y=Ay for all yyy in this common domain.

Discrete eigenbasis. "AAA has a discrete eigenbasis" means: there exist an index set ι\iotaι, a Hilbert basis (bi)i∈ι(b_i)_{i \in \iota}(bi​)i∈ι​ of HHH (an orthonormal family with dense linear span), and real numbers (λi)i∈ι(\lambda_i)_{i \in \iota}(λi​)i∈ι​ such that every bib_ibi​ lies in D(A)D(A)D(A) with Abi=λibiA b_i = \lambda_i b_iAbi​=λi​bi​, and ∣λi∣→∞|\lambda_i| \to \infty∣λi​∣→∞ along the cofinite filter on ι\iotaι, i.e. for every C∈RC \in \mathbb{R}C∈R the set {i∈ι:∣λi∣≤C}\{ i \in \iota : |\lambda_i| \le C \}{i∈ι:∣λi​∣≤C} is finite (automatic when ι\iotaι is finite).

Kernel. E0(AS)={f∈D(AS):ASf=0}E_0(A_S) = \{ f \in D(A_S) : A_S f = 0 \}E0​(AS​)={f∈D(AS​):AS​f=0}, a real linear subspace of D(AS)D(A_S)D(AS​).

Fundamental solution. A map Ψ:R→Matn\Psi : \mathbb{R} \to \mathrm{Mat}_nΨ:R→Matn​ is a fundamental solution of SSS if Ψ(0)=Id\Psi(0) = \mathrm{Id}Ψ(0)=Id and, for every t∈Rt \in \mathbb{R}t∈R, Ψ\PsiΨ is differentiable at ttt (entrywise) with

Ψ′(t)=J0 S([t]) Ψ(t).\Psi'(t) = J_0 \, S([t]) \, \Psi(t).Ψ′(t)=J0​S([t])Ψ(t).

Statement. Let n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}n∈N and let S:T→MatnS : \mathbb{T} \to \mathrm{Mat}_nS:T→Matn​ be continuous with S(t)S(t)S(t) symmetric (S(t)T=S(t)S(t)^{\mathsf T} = S(t)S(t)T=S(t)) for every t∈Tt \in \mathbb{T}t∈T. Then all three of the following hold:

  1. ASA_SAS​ is self-adjoint in the above sense.
  2. ASA_SAS​ has a discrete eigenbasis in the above sense.
  3. For every Ψ:R→Matn\Psi : \mathbb{R} \to \mathrm{Mat}_nΨ:R→Matn​ that is a fundamental solution of SSS, there exists a real-linear isomorphism
E0(AS)  ≅  ker⁡(Ψ(1)−Id)={v∈RI:Ψ(1)v=v},E_0(A_S) \;\cong\; \ker\big(\Psi(1) - \mathrm{Id}\big) = \{ v \in \mathbb{R}^I : \Psi(1) v = v \},E0​(AS​)≅ker(Ψ(1)−Id)={v∈RI:Ψ(1)v=v},

where Ψ(1)−Id\Psi(1) - \mathrm{Id}Ψ(1)−Id acts on column vectors v∈RI≅R2nv \in \mathbb{R}^I \cong \mathbb{R}^{2n}v∈RI≅R2n by matrix multiplication. The isomorphism is only required to exist; no particular map is specified. Part 3 is quantified over all fundamental solutions and asserts nothing if none exists.

No other hypotheses are assumed. For n=0n = 0n=0, H={0}H = \{0\}H={0} and RI=R0\mathbb{R}^I = \mathbb{R}^0RI=R0.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 10, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me