lean_workbook_plus_3642
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Find all , for all .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_3642 (f : ℤ → ℝ) (hf: ∀ k > 0, f k + 4 / (f (k + 1))^2 = 3) : ∃ k, 0 < k ∧ ∀ k > 0, f k + 4 / (f (k + 1))^2 = 3 := by sorry
The classification question is replaced by an unused positive witness and the original hypothesis.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Restore f:ℤ→ℝ with positivity and ask for a complete iff-classification of the functions satisfying the equation for positive k; an existential dummy index is not a classification. The solution family must be established independently.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_3642 (f : ℤ → ℝ) (hf: ∀ k > 0, f k + 4 / (f (k + 1))^2 = 3) : ∃ k, 0 < k ∧ ∀ k > 0, f k + 4 / (f (k + 1))^2 = 3 := by sorry