Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

wind∞\mathrm{wind}_\inftywind∞​ is the winding of the asymptotic eigenvector

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hasWindInfAt_of_hasAsymptoticEigenvector

by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conley-zehnder-indexpseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectizationwinding-numbers

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let uuu be a finite-energy J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic curve on a punctured disk Br(z0)∖{z0}B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}Br​(z0​)∖{z0​}, and suppose that at z0z_0z0​, with sign ε=±1\varepsilon=\pm1ε=±1, uuu has an asymptotic eigenvalue μ\muμ and asymptotic eigenvector vvv of APA_PAP​ for a periodic Reeb orbit PPP (Hryniewicz, Theorem 2.11). Then wind∞\mathrm{wind}_\inftywind∞​ of uuu at z0z_0z0​ is defined and equals the winding number of vvv in the global frame.

Formalization Note The hypothesis is HasAsymptoticEigenvector H J u (cylEndAt z₀) P ε μ v of FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics; the conclusion is ∃ k, HasXiLoopWind P v k ∧ HasWindInfAt H u (cylEndAt z₀) ε k.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz, Lemma 2.16 and Remark 2.17; Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemma 6.8: at a puncture
`z₀` of sign `ε` where `u` has an asymptotic eigenvector `v` (Theorem 2.11), the asymptotic
winding `wind_∞` of `u` at `z₀` is defined and equals the winding number of `v` in the global
frame. -/
theorem exists_hasWindInfAt_of_hasAsymptoticEigenvector (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (z₀ : ℂ) (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (u : ℂ → V 1)
    (hu : IsFiniteEnergyCurve H J (ball z₀ r \ {z₀}) u) (P : ReebOrbit H) (ε : ℝ)
    (hε : ε = 1 ∨ ε = -1) (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ → V 1)
    (hv : HasAsymptoticEigenvector H J u (cylEndAt z₀) P ε μ v) :
    ∃ k : ℤ, HasXiLoopWind P v k ∧ HasWindInfAt H u (cylEndAt z₀) ε k := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, Lemma 2.16 and Remark 2.17; U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemma 6.8
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hasWindInfAt_of_hasAsymptoticEigenvector

Data and hypotheses. Let H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R have a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ be a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH. Let z0∈Cz_0\in\mathbb{C}z0​∈C, r>0r>0r>0, and let u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 be a finite-energy curve on the punctured disk D∗={z:0<∣z−z0∣<r}D^*=\{z: 0<|z-z_0|<r\}D∗={z:0<∣z−z0​∣<r}. Let P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) be a Reeb orbit of HHH, ε∈{1,−1}\varepsilon\in\{1,-1\}ε∈{1,−1}, μ∈R\mu\in\mathbb{R}μ∈R, and v:R→R4v:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4v:R→R4, and assume that vvv is an asymptotic eigenvector of uuu at the end cylz0\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}cylz0​​ with orbit PPP, sign ε\varepsilonε and eigenvalue μ\muμ, which means all of:

  • vvv is an eigenvector of the asymptotic operator of (J,P)(J,P)(J,P) with eigenvalue μ\muμ (defined below);
  • εμ<0\varepsilon\mu<0εμ<0;
  • there are c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}c∈R, functions τ:R2→R\tau:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}τ:R2→R, ρ:R2→R4\rho:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^4ρ:R2→R4 and s0∈Rs_0\in\mathbb{R}s0​∈R such that (s,t)↦τ(s,t)−εTt−c(s,t)\mapsto\tau(s,t)-\varepsilon Tt - c(s,t)↦τ(s,t)−εTt−c and ρ\rhoρ both tend to 000 in C∞C^\inftyC∞ as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞, and for all s≥s0s\ge s_0s≥s0​ and all ttt, setting
h(s,t)=eεμs(v(τ(s,t)/T)+ρ(s,t)),h(s,t) = e^{\varepsilon\mu s}\Big(v\big(\tau(s,t)/T\big) + \rho(s,t)\Big),h(s,t)=eεμs(v(τ(s,t)/T)+ρ(s,t)),

one has h(s,t)∈ξx(τ(s,t))h(s,t)\in\xi_{x(\tau(s,t))}h(s,t)∈ξx(τ(s,t))​ and

Wcylz0(s,t)=pr(x(τ(s,t))+h(s,t)).W_{\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}}(s,t) = \mathrm{pr}\big(x(\tau(s,t)) + h(s,t)\big).Wcylz0​​​(s,t)=pr(x(τ(s,t))+h(s,t)).

"ggg tends to 000 in C∞C^\inftyC∞ as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞" (for ggg on R2\mathbb{R}^2R2) means: ggg is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on (s1,∞)×R(s_1,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}(s1​,∞)×R for some s1s_1s1​, and for every order m≥0m\ge 0m≥0 and every δ>0\delta>0δ>0 there is s2s_2s2​ with ∥Dmg(s,t)∥≤δ\|D^m g(s,t)\|\le\delta∥Dmg(s,t)∥≤δ for all s≥s2s\ge s_2s≥s2​ and all ttt.

Conclusion. There is an integer kkk such that

  1. windξ(P,v)=k\mathrm{wind}_\xi(P, v) = kwindξ​(P,v)=k, i.e. the loop t↦Ξx(Tt)(v(t))t\mapsto\Xi_{x(Tt)}(v(t))t↦Ξx(Tt)​(v(t)) has wind=k\mathrm{wind} = kwind=k; and
  2. wind∞(u,cylz0,ε)=k\mathrm{wind}_\infty(u, \mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}, \varepsilon) = kwind∞​(u,cylz0​​,ε)=k, i.e. there is s0′s_0's0′​ such that for every s≥s0′s\ge s_0's≥s0′​ the loop
t↦ΞW(s,εt)(πξ(W(s,εt)) ∂sW(s,εt)),W=Wcylz0,t\mapsto \Xi_{W(s,\varepsilon t)}\Big(\pi_\xi\big(W(s,\varepsilon t)\big)\,\partial_s W(s,\varepsilon t)\Big),\qquad W = W_{\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}},t↦ΞW(s,εt)​(πξ​(W(s,εt))∂s​W(s,εt)),W=Wcylz0​​​,

has wind=k\mathrm{wind} = kwind=k, where ∂sW(s,t′)\partial_sW(s,t')∂s​W(s,t′) is the derivative of WWW at (s,t′)(s,t')(s,t′) in direction (1,0)(1,0)(1,0) (for ε=−1\varepsilon=-1ε=−1 the loop runs with ttt reversed).

No nondegeneracy, primality or NdEnd\mathrm{NdEnd}NdEnd hypothesis on PPP is assumed; the only link between uuu and PPP is the asymptotic-eigenvector hypothesis. The hypotheses on HHH, JJJ and finite energy are as defined below.

Asymptotic eigenvector of (J,P)(J,P)(J,P). "vvv is an eigenvector with eigenvalue μ\muμ" means: vvv is C∞C^\inftyC∞ and 111-periodic, v(t)∈ξx(Tt)v(t)\in\xi_{x(Tt)}v(t)∈ξx(Tt)​ for all ttt, v(t)≠0v(t)\neq0v(t)=0 for some ttt, and for all ttt

J(x(Tt))(−v′(t)+T DR(x(Tt))v(t))=μ v(t).J\big(x(Tt)\big)\Big(-v'(t) + T\,DR\big(x(Tt)\big)v(t)\Big) = \mu\,v(t).J(x(Tt))(−v′(t)+TDR(x(Tt))v(t))=μv(t).

Meaning of the notions used

Throughout, the ambient space is R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 with coordinates (y0,y1,y2,y3)(y_0,y_1,y_2,y_3)(y0​,y1​,y2​,y3​) (the code's space of functions on a 4-element index set), and C\mathbb{C}C is identified with R2\mathbb{R}^2R2 via z=s+itz = s + itz=s+it.

Linear algebra. j0(v)=(−v1,v0,−v3,v2)j_0(v) = (-v_1, v_0, -v_3, v_2)j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​) and

ω0(u,v)=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2,λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v).\omega_0(u,v) = u_0v_1 - u_1v_0 + u_2v_3 - u_3v_2, \qquad \lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\,\omega_0(x,v).ω0​(u,v)=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​,λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

Star-shaped level. "HHH has a strictly star-shaped level" means: H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u\neq 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x) > 0dHx​(x)>0 at every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. Write S={H=1}S = \{H = 1\}S={H=1}.

Reeb field and contact plane. XH(x)=j0(∇H(x))X_H(x) = j_0(\nabla H(x))XH​(x)=j0​(∇H(x)), and R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R(x) = \lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1} X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (with the convention 0−1=00^{-1} = 00−1=0). The plane ξx\xi_xξx​ is {v:λx(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0}\{v : \lambda_x(v) = 0 \text{ and } dH_x(v) = 0\}{v:λx​(v)=0 and dHx​(v)=0} (defined for every xxx, not only on SSS). The projection πξ\pi_\xiπξ​ is πξ(x)v=v−λx(v) R(x)\pi_\xi(x)v = v - \lambda_x(v)\,R(x)πξ​(x)v=v−λx​(v)R(x).

Compatible JJJ. "JJJ is a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH" means: J:R4→L(R4,R4)J:\mathbb{R}^4\to \mathrm{L}(\mathbb{R}^4,\mathbb{R}^4)J:R4→L(R4,R4) is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every x∈Sx\in Sx∈S and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v\in\xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)2v=−vJ(x)^2 v = -vJ(x)2v=−v, ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v,J(x)v) > 0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 if v≠0v\neq 0v=0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v,J(x)w) = \omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x)J(x)J(x) off ξx\xi_xξx​ or off SSS.

Radial projection. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 let σ(y)\sigma(y)σ(y) be the unique r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if such rrr exists, and σ(y)=1\sigma(y)=1σ(y)=1 otherwise (in particular σ(0)=1\sigma(0)=1σ(0)=1). Then pr(y)=σ(y) y\mathrm{pr}(y) = \sigma(y)\,ypr(y)=σ(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡σ(y)a(y) = -\tfrac12\log\sigma(y)a(y)=−21​logσ(y).

Almost complex structure J~\tilde JJ~. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 put x=pr(y)x = \mathrm{pr}(y)x=pr(y), r=σ(y)r=\sigma(y)r=σ(y), α(v)=r2 dHx(x) dHx(v)\alpha(v) = \frac{r}{2\,dH_x(x)}\,dH_x(v)α(v)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(v), β(v)=r λx(v)\beta(v) = r\,\lambda_x(v)β(v)=rλx​(v), w(v)=v−2α(v) y−β(v) r−1R(x)w(v) = v - 2\alpha(v)\,y - \beta(v)\,r^{-1}R(x)w(v)=v−2α(v)y−β(v)r−1R(x), and

J~(y)v=α(v) r−1R(x)−2β(v) y+J(x) w(v).\tilde J(y)v = \alpha(v)\,r^{-1}R(x) - 2\beta(v)\,y + J(x)\,w(v).J~(y)v=α(v)r−1R(x)−2β(v)y+J(x)w(v).

Finite-energy curve. For U⊆CU\subseteq\mathbb{C}U⊆C, "uuu is a finite-energy curve on UUU" means: u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on UUU; u(z)≠0u(z)\neq 0u(z)=0 for z∈Uz\in Uz∈U; at every z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is (real-)differentiable and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_s u(z) + \tilde J(u(z))\,\partial_t u(z) = 0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0; and

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫Umax⁡(0, φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)) dz<∞,E(u) = \sup_{\varphi}\int_U \max\Big(0,\ \varphi'(a)\big(\partial_s a\,\lambda_w(\partial_t w) - \partial_t a\,\lambda_w(\partial_s w)\big) + \varphi(a)\,\omega_0(\partial_s w,\partial_t w)\Big)\,dz < \infty,E(u)=φsup​∫U​max(0, φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w))dz<∞,

where a=a∘ua = a\circ ua=a∘u, w=pr∘uw = \mathrm{pr}\circ uw=pr∘u, and φ\varphiφ ranges over C∞C^\inftyC∞ nondecreasing functions R→[0,1]\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]R→[0,1]. Values of uuu outside UUU are unconstrained. Derivatives here and below are Fréchet derivatives, with the convention that the derivative at a point of non-differentiability is 000.

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH is a pair (x,T)(x,T)(x,T) with T>0T>0T>0 and x:R→R4x:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4x:R→R4 such that H(x(τ))=1H(x(\tau)) = 1H(x(τ))=1, x′(τ)=R(x(τ))x'(\tau) = R(x(\tau))x′(τ)=R(x(τ)) and x(τ+T)=x(τ)x(\tau+T) = x(\tau)x(τ+T)=x(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TTT is any positive period (not necessarily the minimal one).

End parametrizations. cyl∞(s,t)=e2πse2πit\mathrm{cyl}_\infty(s,t) = e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi i t}cyl∞​(s,t)=e2πse2πit (large circles, counterclockwise in ttt), and for z0∈Cz_0\in\mathbb{C}z0​∈C, cylz0(s,t)=z0+e−2πse−2πit\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}(s,t) = z_0 + e^{-2\pi s}e^{-2\pi i t}cylz0​​(s,t)=z0​+e−2πse−2πit (small circles around z0z_0z0​, clockwise in ttt). For such a map eee write We(s,t)=pr(u(e(s,t)))W_e(s,t) = \mathrm{pr}(u(e(s,t)))We​(s,t)=pr(u(e(s,t))) and Ae(s,t)=a(u(e(s,t)))A_e(s,t) = a(u(e(s,t)))Ae​(s,t)=a(u(e(s,t))). Note that only large sss enters the conditions below; for small sss these maps may leave the region where uuu is constrained.

"Nondegenerate end". For ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R}ε∈R, NdEnd(u,e,P,ε)\mathrm{NdEnd}(u, e, P, \varepsilon)NdEnd(u,e,P,ε) means: there are d,c∈Rd, c\in\mathbb{R}d,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 such that, uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞,

Ae(s,t)−εTs−d→0,ebs ∣We(s,t)−x(εTt+c)∣→0.A_e(s,t) - \varepsilon T s - d \to 0, \qquad e^{bs}\,\big|W_e(s,t) - x(\varepsilon T t + c)\big| \to 0.Ae​(s,t)−εTs−d→0,ebs​We​(s,t)−x(εTt+c)​→0.

(This is an exponential convergence condition on uuu along the end; it contains no hypothesis on the linearized Reeb flow of PPP.)

ξ\xiξ-coordinates. For x,v∈R4x, v\in\mathbb{R}^4x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, define Q1x=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1x = (-x_2, x_3, x_0, -x_1)Q1​x=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2x=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2x = (x_3, x_2, -x_1, -x_0)Q2​x=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​),

ei(x)=∣x∣−1(Qix−dHx(Qix)dHx(x) x)(i=1,2),e_i(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_ix - \frac{dH_x(Q_ix)}{dH_x(x)}\,x\Big)\quad(i=1,2),ei​(x)=∣x∣−1(Qi​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Qi​x)​x)(i=1,2),

(with 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0 and division by 000 giving 000), and

Ξx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v) ∈C.\Xi_x(v) = \omega_0(v, e_2(x)) + i\,\omega_0(e_1(x), v)\ \in\mathbb{C}.Ξx​(v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v) ∈C.

Winding of a loop. For f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C and k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}k∈Z, wind(f)=k\mathrm{wind}(f) = kwind(f)=k means: fff is continuous, 111-periodic, never 000, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}θ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t) = |f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1) - \theta(0) = 2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me