Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and J a smooth dλ0-compatible complex structure on ξ. Let u be a finite-energy J~-holomorphic curve on a punctured disk Br(z0)∖{z0}, and suppose that at z0, with sign ε=±1, u has an asymptotic eigenvalue μ and asymptotic eigenvector v of AP for a periodic Reeb orbit P (Hryniewicz, Theorem 2.11). Then wind∞ of u at z0 is defined and equals the winding number of v in the global frame.
Formalization Note The hypothesis is HasAsymptoticEigenvector H J u (cylEndAt z₀) P ε μ v of FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics; the conclusion is ∃ k, HasXiLoopWind P v k ∧ HasWindInfAt H u (cylEndAt z₀) ε k.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane
open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real
/-- Hryniewicz, Lemma 2.16 and Remark 2.17; Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Lemma 6.8: at a puncture
`z₀` of sign `ε` where `u` has an asymptotic eigenvector `v` (Theorem 2.11), the asymptotic
winding `wind_∞` of `u` at `z₀` is defined and equals the winding number of `v` in the global
frame. -/
theorem exists_hasWindInfAt_of_hasAsymptoticEigenvector (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
(J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
(z₀ : ℂ) (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (u : ℂ → V 1)
(hu : IsFiniteEnergyCurve H J (ball z₀ r \ {z₀}) u) (P : ReebOrbit H) (ε : ℝ)
(hε : ε = 1 ∨ ε = -1) (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ → V 1)
(hv : HasAsymptoticEigenvector H J u (cylEndAt z₀) P ε μ v) :
∃ k : ℤ, HasXiLoopWind P v k ∧ HasWindInfAt H u (cylEndAt z₀) ε k := by
sorry
end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, Lemma 2.16 and Remark 2.17; U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Lemma 6.8
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5
Data and hypotheses. Let H:R4→R have a strictly star-shaped level and J be a compatible ξ-structure for H. Let z0∈C, r>0, and let u:C→R4 be a finite-energy curve on the punctured disk D∗={z:0<∣z−z0∣<r}. Let P=(x,T) be a Reeb orbit of H, ε∈{1,−1}, μ∈R, and v:R→R4, and assume that v is an asymptotic eigenvector of u at the end cylz0 with orbit P, sign ε and eigenvalue μ, which means all of:
v is an eigenvector of the asymptotic operator of (J,P) with eigenvalue μ (defined below);
εμ<0;
there are c∈R, functions τ:R2→R, ρ:R2→R4 and s0∈R such that (s,t)↦τ(s,t)−εTt−c and ρ both tend to 0 in C∞ as s→+∞, and for all s≥s0 and all t, setting
h(s,t)=eεμs(v(τ(s,t)/T)+ρ(s,t)),
one has h(s,t)∈ξx(τ(s,t)) and
Wcylz0(s,t)=pr(x(τ(s,t))+h(s,t)).
"g tends to 0 in C∞ as s→+∞" (for g on R2) means: g is C∞ on (s1,∞)×R for some s1, and for every order m≥0 and every δ>0 there is s2 with ∥Dmg(s,t)∥≤δ for all s≥s2 and all t.
Conclusion. There is an integer k such that
windξ(P,v)=k, i.e. the loop t↦Ξx(Tt)(v(t)) has wind=k; and
wind∞(u,cylz0,ε)=k, i.e. there is s0′ such that for every s≥s0′ the loop
t↦ΞW(s,εt)(πξ(W(s,εt))∂sW(s,εt)),W=Wcylz0,
has wind=k, where ∂sW(s,t′) is the derivative of W at (s,t′) in direction (1,0) (for ε=−1 the loop runs with t reversed).
No nondegeneracy, primality or NdEnd hypothesis on P is assumed; the only link between u and P is the asymptotic-eigenvector hypothesis. The hypotheses on H, J and finite energy are as defined below.
Asymptotic eigenvector of (J,P). "v is an eigenvector with eigenvalue μ" means: v is C∞ and 1-periodic, v(t)∈ξx(Tt) for all t, v(t)=0 for some t, and for all t
J(x(Tt))(−v′(t)+TDR(x(Tt))v(t))=μv(t).
Meaning of the notions used
Throughout, the ambient space is R4 with coordinates (y0,y1,y2,y3) (the code's space of functions on a 4-element index set), and C is identified with R2 via z=s+it.
Star-shaped level. "H has a strictly star-shaped level" means: H:R4→R is C∞; for every u=0 there is exactly one r>0 with H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0 at every x with H(x)=1. Write S={H=1}.
Reeb field and contact plane.XH(x)=j0(∇H(x)), and R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x) (with the convention 0−1=0). The plane ξx is {v:λx(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0} (defined for every x, not only on S). The projection πξ is πξ(x)v=v−λx(v)R(x).
Compatible J. "J is a compatible ξ-structure for H" means: J:R4→L(R4,R4) is C∞, and for every x∈S and all v,w∈ξx: J(x)v∈ξx, J(x)2v=−v, ω0(v,J(x)v)>0 if v=0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x) off ξx or off S.
Radial projection. For y∈R4 let σ(y) be the unique r>0 with H(ry)=1 if such r exists, and σ(y)=1 otherwise (in particular σ(0)=1). Then pr(y)=σ(y)y and a(y)=−21logσ(y).
Almost complex structure J~. For y∈R4 put x=pr(y), r=σ(y), α(v)=2dHx(x)rdHx(v), β(v)=rλx(v), w(v)=v−2α(v)y−β(v)r−1R(x), and
J~(y)v=α(v)r−1R(x)−2β(v)y+J(x)w(v).
Finite-energy curve. For U⊆C, "u is a finite-energy curve on U" means: u:C→R4 is C∞ on U; u(z)=0 for z∈U; at every z∈U, u is (real-)differentiable and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z))∂tu(z)=0; and
where a=a∘u, w=pr∘u, and φ ranges over C∞ nondecreasing functions R→[0,1]. Values of u outside U are unconstrained. Derivatives here and below are Fréchet derivatives, with the convention that the derivative at a point of non-differentiability is 0.
Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit P of H is a pair (x,T) with T>0 and x:R→R4 such that H(x(τ))=1, x′(τ)=R(x(τ)) and x(τ+T)=x(τ) for all τ. T is any positive period (not necessarily the minimal one).
End parametrizations.cyl∞(s,t)=e2πse2πit (large circles, counterclockwise in t), and for z0∈C, cylz0(s,t)=z0+e−2πse−2πit (small circles around z0, clockwise in t). For such a map e write We(s,t)=pr(u(e(s,t))) and Ae(s,t)=a(u(e(s,t))). Note that only large s enters the conditions below; for small s these maps may leave the region where u is constrained.
"Nondegenerate end". For ε∈R, NdEnd(u,e,P,ε) means: there are d,c∈R and b>0 such that, uniformly in t∈R, as s→+∞,
Ae(s,t)−εTs−d→0,ebsWe(s,t)−x(εTt+c)→0.
(This is an exponential convergence condition on u along the end; it contains no hypothesis on the linearized Reeb flow of P.)
ξ-coordinates. For x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, define Q1x=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1), Q2x=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0),
ei(x)=∣x∣−1(Qix−dHx(x)dHx(Qix)x)(i=1,2),
(with 0−1=0 and division by 0 giving 0), and
Ξx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+iω0(e1(x),v)∈C.
Winding of a loop. For f:R→C and k∈Z, wind(f)=k means: f is continuous, 1-periodic, never 0, and there is a continuous θ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all t and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.