Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 4.2 — regularized momentum bound

Proved
BirkhoffRestrictedThreeBody.momentum_bound

by Yivy Yu · Sep 10, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

celestial-mechanicsdynamical-systemshamiltonian-dynamics

Let 0≤μ≤120\le\mu\le\tfrac120≤μ≤21​ and c≥2.1c\ge2.1c≥2.1. On the compact component Σμ,c\Sigma_{\mu,c}Σμ,c​ of the Levi-Civita-regularized energy hypersurface corresponding to the primary at q=(−μ,0)q=(-\mu,0)q=(−μ,0), every state (z1,z2,w1,w2)(z_1,z_2,w_1,w_2)(z1​,z2​,w1​,w2​) satisfies

w12+w22≤2.\sqrt{w_1^2+w_2^2}\le2.w12​+w22​​≤2.

This a priori momentum estimate is Lemma 4.2 of Joung and van Koert. Together with the position bound, it confines the component to a fixed box used in the paper's validated convexity computation.

Formalization Note. The component is selected inside Kμ,c−1(0)∩{D>0}K_{\mu,c}^{-1}(0)\cap\{D>0\}Kμ,c−1​(0)∩{D>0} by the base point (0,0,1−μ,0)(0,0,\sqrt{1-\mu},0)(0,0,1−μ​,0); all parameter endpoints are included.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffRestrictedThreeBody
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffRestrictedThreeBody

/-- Joung--van Koert, Lemma 4.2. -/
theorem momentum_bound (μ c : ℝ) (hμ0 : 0 ≤ μ) (hμhalf : μ ≤ 1 / 2)
    (hc : 21 / 10 ≤ c) (s : Phase) (hs : s ∈ leftEnergyComponent μ c) :
    Real.sqrt (wNormSq s) ≤ 2 := by sorry

end BirkhoffRestrictedThreeBody
Source
Joung--van Koert, Computational symplectic topology and symmetric orbits in the restricted three-body problem, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19159, p. 19, Lemma 4.2.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-5

For all real parameters μ,c\mu,cμ,c with 0≤μ≤120\le \mu\le \tfrac120≤μ≤21​ and c≥2110c\ge \tfrac{21}{10}c≥1021​, and every four-coordinate real state s=(s0,s1,s2,s3)∈R4s=(s_0,s_1,s_2,s_3)\in\mathbb R^4s=(s0​,s1​,s2​,s3​)∈R4, suppose that sss lies in the connected component, within the set Rμ,c\mathcal R_{\mu,c}Rμ,c​, containing the base point bμ=(0,0,1−μ,0)b_\mu=(0,0,\sqrt{1-\mu},0)bμ​=(0,0,1−μ​,0), where Rμ,c\mathcal R_{\mu,c}Rμ,c​ consists exactly of the states x=(x0,x1,x2,x3)x=(x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3)x=(x0​,x1​,x2​,x3​) satisfying Kμ,c(x)=0K_{\mu,c}(x)=0Kμ,c​(x)=0 and D(x)>0D(x)>0D(x)>0, with D(x)=(2(x02−x12)−1)2+(4x0x1)2D(x)=\bigl(2(x_0^2-x_1^2)-1\bigr)^2+(4x_0x_1)^2D(x)=(2(x02​−x12​)−1)2+(4x0​x1​)2 and

Kμ,c(x)=x22+x322+c(x02+x12)−1−μ2+2(x02+x12)(x0x3−x1x2)−μ(x0x3+x1x2)−μ(x02+x12)D(x).K_{\mu,c}(x)=\frac{x_2^2+x_3^2}{2}+c(x_0^2+x_1^2)-\frac{1-\mu}{2}+2(x_0^2+x_1^2)(x_0x_3-x_1x_2)-\mu(x_0x_3+x_1x_2)-\frac{\mu(x_0^2+x_1^2)}{\sqrt{D(x)}}.Kμ,c​(x)=2x22​+x32​​+c(x02​+x12​)−21−μ​+2(x02​+x12​)(x0​x3​−x1​x2​)−μ(x0​x3​+x1​x2​)−D(x)​μ(x02​+x12​)​.

Then s22+s32≤2\sqrt{s_2^2+s_3^2}\le 2s22​+s32​​≤2. The parameter bounds are inclusive, so μ=0\mu=0μ=0, μ=12\mu=\tfrac12μ=21​, and c=2110c=\tfrac{21}{10}c=1021​ are allowed; the state may equal the base point; and the strict condition D(x)>0D(x)>0D(x)>0 on the entire defining locus excludes a zero square-root denominator, while no separate nonzero-coordinate, collision-free, differentiability, flow, or strict-energy hypothesis is imposed.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, licensed under Apache 2.0.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTermsJoin SlackJoin Zulip© 2026 Prove2Me