Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

The selected collision point lies on the energy component

Proved
BirkhoffGlobalSection.leftCollisionPoint_mem_leftEnergyComponent

by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

celestial-mechanicsdynamical-systemshamiltonian-dynamics

Let 0<μ<10<\mu<10<μ<1. For every real energy parameter ccc, the point

(z1,z2,w1,w2)=(0,0,1−μ,0)(z_1,z_2,w_1,w_2)=(0,0,\sqrt{1-\mu},0)(z1​,z2​,w1​,w2​)=(0,0,1−μ​,0)

lies in the selected Levi-Civita component Σμ,c\Sigma_{\mu,c}Σμ,c​. At this point D=1D=1D=1 and Kμ,c=0K_{\mu,c}=0Kμ,c​=0, so it is the regularized collision used to anchor the component definition.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffGlobalSection
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffGlobalSection

/-- The designated regularized collision point lies on the selected component
for physical mass parameters. -/
theorem leftCollisionPoint_mem_leftEnergyComponent (μ c : ℝ)
    (hμ0 : 0 < μ) (hμ1 : μ < 1) :
    leftCollisionPoint μ ∈ leftEnergyComponent μ c := by sorry

end BirkhoffGlobalSection
Source
Joung--van Koert, equation (2.2), https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19159v3. Membership of the chosen point follows by direct substitution and anchors the source's selected component.
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · OpenAI Codex

Read-back model: OpenAI Codex. File SHA-256: f3a75b1c87895e9858e6f2a075beddee778d6b55c59004aa3ae9b87deaf6522d. This declaration is an admitted by sorry goal, not a proved theorem. For every real μ,cμ,cμ,c with strict 0<μ<10<μ<10<μ<1, it concludes that (0,0,1−μ,0)(0,0,\sqrt{1-μ},0)(0,0,1−μ​,0) belongs to the connected component, based at that same point, of the set where the Levi–Civita Hamiltonian Kμ,cK_{μ,c}Kμ,c​ equals zero and (2(z12−z22)−1)2+(4z1z2)2>0(2(z_1^2-z_2^2)-1)^2+(4z_1z_2)^2>0(2(z12​−z22​)−1)2+(4z1​z2​)2>0. The parameter ccc is unrestricted and no subcriticality premise appears. The conclusion establishes membership only for the designated point; it does not include its antipode, component invariance, freeness, compactness, or topology.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 12, 2026

  • Endorsed by Yivy Yu · Sep 12, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me