lean_workbook_plus_50564
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let , , and be prime numbers. Show that
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_50564 (a b c : ℕ) (ha : a.Prime) (hb : b.Prime) (hc : c.Prime) : 3 / 2 < (a + b + c) / 2 ∧ (a + b + c) / 2 < 5 / 2 := by sorry
The source interval is already impossible since each prime is at least2, independently of natural-division mistyping.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
Use real division and replace the impossible upper bound by the actual lower bound(a+b+c)/2≥3; there is no uniform upper bound for arbitrary primes.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_50564 (a b c : ℕ) (ha : a.Prime) (hb : b.Prime) (hc : c.Prime) : 3 / 2 < (a + b + c) / 2 ∧ (a + b + c) / 2 < 5 / 2 := by sorry