(corrected: from transposed tables)
ProvedNoSignalPA.abs_mu_lecryptographynonlocalityp2o-correctedp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1privacy-amplificationquantum-information
Fix an entry and let . For every string , the coefficient satisfies
This is the uniform bound on the weights that makes the exponential-moment argument of Lemma 2 applicable.
Differences from the source:
- correction: |Γ_a⟩ built from the tables |γ₀⟩, |γ₁⟩ printed in Lemma 1 (p. 2) → |Γ_a⟩ built from their transposes (gammaCoef); reason: the printed tables are transposed relative to layout (3): for Nr = 1 and the nonsignaling box a = 1 ⊕ x, b = 0, P_{a=0|x=0} = 0 but the printed ⟨γ₀|P⟩ = 1; with the transposes Lemma 1 holds; this statement is unchanged by the transposition, because a ⊕ b ⊕ x·y is symmetric under (a, x) ↔ (b, y)
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_NoSignalPA_gammaVec import Definitions.Def_NoSignalPA_ones
Formal statement
namespace NoSignalPA
/-- **`|μ_a| ≤ 5^M 8^{−Nr}`.**
Ll. Masanes, *Universally-composable privacy amplification from causality constraints*,
arXiv:0807.2158v4, Appendix, proof of Lemma 2, p. 5 (PDF p. 5): "Let `µ_a = Γ_a(a0, b0, x0, y0)`,
`M = ‖a0 ⊕ b0 ⊕ x0 · y0‖`, and note that `|µ_a| ≤ 5^M 8^{−Nr}` for all a."
For a fixed entry `(a₀, b₀, x₀, y₀)` and every string `s` (the paper's `a`),
`|Γ_s(a₀, b₀, x₀, y₀)| ≤ 5^M · 8^{−Nr}` with `M = ‖a₀ ⊕ b₀ ⊕ x₀·y₀‖`.
**Formalization Note.** `Γ_s` is the corrected vector (transposed tables); the bound holds for
the printed tables too, since `a ⊕ b ⊕ x·y` is symmetric under `(a, x) ↔ (b, y)`. -/
theorem abs_mu_le {Nr : ℕ} (s a₀ b₀ x₀ y₀ : Str Nr) :
|gammaVec s a₀ b₀ x₀ y₀|
≤ 5 ^ ones (fun i => xor (xor (a₀ i) (b₀ i)) (x₀ i && y₀ i)) * ((8 : ℝ) ^ Nr)⁻¹ := by sorry
end NoSignalPA
Source
Masanes, Universally-composable privacy amplification from causality constraints, arXiv:0807.2158v4, Appendix, proof of Lemma 2, p.5
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.