Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

An E_W/E_eta gap guarantees PPT and LOCC irreversibility

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P90.wang_duan_irreversibility_criterion

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems are finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces with fixed orthonormal product bases and positive local dimensions. A state is a positive semidefinite operator of trace one. All logarithms are base two and all operational rates are measured in standard Bell pairs (ebits) per input copy, with deterministic operations and error tending to zero. Write ED,ECE_D,E_CED​,EC​ for distillable entanglement and entanglement cost under completely PPT-preserving CPTP operations; an explicit LOCC subscript denotes unrestricted two-way local operations and classical communication.

For a bipartite state ρ\rhoρ with support projection PPP, put EW(ρ)=inf⁡X=X†, X≥ρlog⁡2∥XTB∥1E_W(\rho)=\inf_{X=X^\dagger,\,X\ge\rho}\log_2\|X^{T_B}\|_1EW​(ρ)=infX=X†,X≥ρ​log2​∥XTB​∥1​ and Eη(ρ)=−log⁡2min⁡{∥YTB∥∞:Y=Y†, −Y≤PTB≤Y}E_\eta(\rho)=-\log_2\min\{\|Y^{T_B}\|_\infty:Y=Y^\dagger,\ -Y\le P^{T_B}\le Y\}Eη​(ρ)=−log2​min{∥YTB​∥∞​:Y=Y†, −Y≤PTB​≤Y}. If EW(ρ)<Eη(ρ)E_W(\rho)<E_\eta(\rho)EW​(ρ)<Eη​(ρ), then

ED(ρ)<EC(ρ),ED,LOCC(ρ)<EC,LOCC(ρ).E_D(\rho)<E_C(\rho),\qquad E_{D,\mathrm{LOCC}}(\rho)<E_{C,\mathrm{LOCC}}(\rho).ED​(ρ)<EC​(ρ),ED,LOCC​(ρ)<EC,LOCC​(ρ).

The paper credits the background upper bound ED≤EWE_D\le E_WED​≤EW​ to Ref. [30]. The additional LOCC conclusion is explicitly advertised in the abstract and discussion.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P90
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P90

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

open QAlgorithms

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P36
  (relativeEntropy rains target canonicalMatrix allowed pptDistillable)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P04 (gamma copies IsPPT)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Next46.P42 (regroupProduct)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P06 (supportProjection)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P21 (FiniteLOCC)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P32 (antisymmetricQutrit)

/-- arXiv:1606.09421v3, PDF pp.4--5: the displayed PPT criterion and its
explicitly advertised LOCC consequence. E_D<=E_W is credited to Ref.[30]. -/
theorem wang_duan_irreversibility_criterion {A B : Type} [Fintype A] [Fintype B]
    [DecidableEq A] [DecidableEq B] [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B]
    (rho : Matrix (A × B) (A × B) ℂ) (hstate : IsDensityMatrix rho)
    (hgap : wangDuanBound rho < etaEntanglement rho) :
    pptDistillable rho < asymptoticEntanglementCost false rho ∧
    loccDistillable rho < asymptoticEntanglementCost true rho := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P90

end
Source
Irreversibility of Asymptotic Entanglement Manipulation Under Quantum Operations Completely Preserving Positivity of Partial Transpose, arXiv:1606.09421v3, PDF p. 4, Unnumbered sufficient condition: E_W below E_eta forces irreversibility
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For arbitrary finite, nonempty types A,BA,BA,B, both equipped with decidable equality, and every complex matrix ρ\rhoρ on A×BA\times BA×B, assume that ρ≥0\rho\ge0ρ≥0, Tr⁡ρ=1\operatorname{Tr}\rho=1Trρ=1, and W(ρ)<η(ρ)W(\rho)<\eta(\rho)W(ρ)<η(ρ), where, writing (ΓX)(a,b),(a′,b′)=X(a,b′),(a′,b)(\Gamma X)_{(a,b),(a',b')}=X_{(a,b'),(a',b)}(ΓX)(a,b),(a′,b′)​=X(a,b′),(a′,b)​,

W(ρ)=inf⁡X=X†X−ρ≥0log⁡2∥ΓX∥1,η(ρ)=−log⁡2inf⁡Y=Y†Y−ΓPρ≥0Y+ΓPρ≥0∥ΓY∥op.W(\rho)=\inf_{\substack{X=X^\dagger\\X-\rho\ge0}}\log_2\|\Gamma X\|_1, \qquad \eta(\rho)=-\log_2 \inf_{\substack{Y=Y^\dagger\\Y-\Gamma P_\rho\ge0\\Y+\Gamma P_\rho\ge0}}\|\Gamma Y\|_{\rm op}.W(ρ)=X=X†X−ρ≥0​inf​log2​∥ΓX∥1​,η(ρ)=−log2​Y=Y†Y−ΓPρ​≥0Y+ΓPρ​≥0​inf​∥ΓY∥op​.

Here PρP_\rhoPρ​ is obtained from ρ\rhoρ by spectral functional calculus for the function equal to 000 at 000 and 111 elsewhere, ∥⋅∥op\|\cdot\|_{\rm op}∥⋅∥op​ is the Euclidean operator norm, ∥X∥1=Re⁡Tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=ReTrX†X​, and log⁡2x=log⁡x/log⁡2\log_2x=\log x/\log2log2​x=logx/log2 uses the total real logarithm with log⁡0=0\log0=0log0=0. The conclusion is

DPPT(ρ)<CPPT(ρ),DLOCC(ρ)<CLOCC(ρ)D_{\mathrm{PPT}}(\rho)<C_{\mathrm{PPT}}(\rho), \qquad D_{\mathrm{LOCC}}(\rho)<C_{\mathrm{LOCC}}(\rho)DPPT​(ρ)<CPPT​(ρ),DLOCC​(ρ)<CLOCC​(ρ)

in the extended real line. A channel is a finite Kraus sum X↦∑jKjXKj†X\mapsto\sum_jK_jXK_j^\daggerX↦∑j​Kj​XKj†​ with ∑jKj†Kj=I\sum_jK_j^\dagger K_j=I∑j​Kj†​Kj​=I; PPT channels are those whose input-output partial-transpose conjugates are also channels. Finite LOCC maps are generated by the identity and finite recursive trees of complete local Kraus instruments on either party, with outcome-dependent subsequent maps and all branches summed. Let Φk\Phi_kΦk​ have entry 1/k1/k1/k when both row and column have equal party indices and 000 otherwise, and let ρ⊗n^\widehat{\rho^{\otimes n}}ρ⊗n​ denote the matrix with product entries, grouped by party and relabelled by fixed bijections with finite initial segments. The quantity DPPT(ρ)D_{\mathrm{PPT}}(\rho)DPPT​(ρ) is the supremum of real r≥0r\ge0r≥0 such that, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, all sufficiently large natural nnn admit a PPT map with ∥Λ(ρ⊗n^)−Φ⌈2nr⌉∥1≤ε\|\Lambda(\widehat{\rho^{\otimes n}})-\Phi_{\lceil2^{nr}\rceil}\|_1\le\varepsilon∥Λ(ρ⊗n​)−Φ⌈2nr⌉​∥1​≤ε. The quantity DLOCC(ρ)D_{\mathrm{LOCC}}(\rho)DLOCC​(ρ) is the supremum of real r≥0r\ge0r≥0 such that, for every ε,δ>0\varepsilon,\delta>0ε,δ>0, all sufficiently large positive natural nnn admit m∈Nm\in\mathbb Nm∈N and a finite LOCC map with n(r−δ)≤mn(r-\delta)\le mn(r−δ)≤m and ∥Λ(ρ⊗n^)−Φ2m∥1≤ε\|\Lambda(\widehat{\rho^{\otimes n}})-\Phi_{2^m}\|_1\le\varepsilon∥Λ(ρ⊗n​)−Φ2m​∥1​≤ε. For either class C\mathcal CC, CC(ρ)C_{\mathcal C}(\rho)CC​(ρ) is the infimum of real r≥0r\ge0r≥0 such that, for every ε,δ>0\varepsilon,\delta>0ε,δ>0, all sufficiently large positive natural nnn admit m∈Nm\in\mathbb Nm∈N and Λ∈C\Lambda\in\mathcal CΛ∈C with m≤n(r+δ)m\le n(r+\delta)m≤n(r+δ) and ∥Λ(Φ2m)−ρ⊗n^∥1≤ε\|\Lambda(\Phi_{2^m})-\widehat{\rho^{\otimes n}}\|_1\le\varepsilon∥Λ(Φ2m​)−ρ⊗n​∥1​≤ε. These definitions allow m=0m=0m=0 and one-dimensional party types.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me