Assuming Waldschmidt 1973: if e^{ir/π} is algebraic for a rational r ≠ 0, then two of π, e, e^{π²} are algebraically independent
ProvedDiazModulus.pi_e_exp_pi_sq_indep_of_exp_i_rat_div_piAssume Waldschmidt's theorem of 1973, the hypothesis hW73: if are linearly independent over , are linearly independent over , and and are algebraic, then two of the eight numbers , , are algebraically independent. Let be rational with algebraic. Then two of
are algebraically independent.
At : either is transcendental, or two of , , are algebraically independent. The second alternative is an open problem listed by Waldschmidt (Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups, 2000, §15.3.5, p. 594). The first is the smallest case of the statement (S) for real (DiazModulus.recip_pi_not_log_real_gamma, Open). The same hypothesis, algebraic, also makes transcendental (DiazModulus.exp_i_div_pi_or_exp_i_pi_cube_transcendental), which is a different consequence.
Proof. Take and . The pair is -independent because is irrational, and because is not real. The column carries and , both algebraic. The other two exponentials are and . If no two of , , were algebraically independent, then, being transcendental, and would be algebraic over . Then so would all eight numbers, since a positive power of is an integer power of . They would generate a field of transcendence degree at most one, against the hypothesis.
Novelty. None: this is a specialisation of a published theorem. It is not stated in the sources read, but it is one substitution in the Théorème of M. Waldschmidt, Solution du huitième problème de Schneider, J. Number Theory 5 (1973), p. 192, restated as Theorem 7.4.1 of Nombres transcendants (LN 402), Corollary 15.28(c) of Diophantine Approximation on Linear Algebraic Groups and Corollary 1.2(c) of Roy–Waldschmidt (1997). It is also one line from Exercise 15.15(e) of the same book (p. 614). The theorem has no formal proof yet, so it is carried as a hypothesis. The contribution of this node is the formal derivation.
import Mathlib
namespace DiazModulus
/-- Assume Waldschmidt's theorem of 1973: if `x₁, x₂` are `ℚ`-linearly independent, `y₁, y₂` are
`ℚ`-linearly independent, and `e^{x₁y₂}` and `e^{x₂y₂}` are algebraic, then two of the numbers
`xᵢ`, `yⱼ`, `e^{xᵢyⱼ}` are algebraically independent. If `e^{ir/π}` is algebraic for some non-zero
rational `r`, then two of `π`, `e`, `e^{π²}` are algebraically independent. -/
theorem pi_e_exp_pi_sq_indep_of_exp_i_rat_div_pi
(hW73 : ∀ x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : ℂ, LinearIndependent ℚ ![x₁, x₂] → LinearIndependent ℚ ![y₁, y₂] →
IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (x₁ * y₂)) → IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (x₂ * y₂)) →
∃ a ∈ ({x₁, x₂, y₁, y₂, Complex.exp (x₁ * y₁), Complex.exp (x₁ * y₂),
Complex.exp (x₂ * y₁), Complex.exp (x₂ * y₂)} : Set ℂ),
∃ b ∈ ({x₁, x₂, y₁, y₂, Complex.exp (x₁ * y₁), Complex.exp (x₁ * y₂),
Complex.exp (x₂ * y₁), Complex.exp (x₂ * y₂)} : Set ℂ),
AlgebraicIndependent ℚ ![a, b])
(r : ℚ) (hr : r ≠ 0)
(halg : IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.I * (r : ℂ) / ((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ)))) :
∃ a ∈ ({((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ), Complex.exp 1, Complex.exp (((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ) ^ 2)} : Set ℂ),
∃ b ∈ ({((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ), Complex.exp 1, Complex.exp (((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ) ^ 2)} : Set ℂ),
AlgebraicIndependent ℚ ![a, b] := by
sorry
end DiazModulus