lean_workbook_plus_70981
Proved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Provedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Let be the integer sequence such that\n \n\n(i) Determine the general term .\n\n(ii) Find all such that
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_70981 (a : ℤ) (u : ℕ → ℤ) (h₁ : u 1 = 1 ∧ u 2 = 2 ∧ u 4 = 5) (h₂ : a^2 = 1) (h₃ : ∀ n ≥ 2, u (n + 1) * u (n - 1) = u n ^ 2 + a) : ∃ f : ℕ → ℤ, ∀ n ≥ 1, u n = f n := by sorry
A closed-form sequence/classification is replaced by existence of an arbitrary equal function.
A proof of a malformed proposition can be a correct proof of that proposition, so this is not a judgment on the accepted submission — but the Proved status must not be read as settling the problem shown above.
Proposed corrected statement
Ask for and verify an explicit formula for u(n) for n≥1 from the source recurrence, then characterize all 2≤n≤2012 with 10∣u(n). An arbitrary equal sequence is not an explicit formula.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_70981 (a : ℤ) (u : ℕ → ℤ) (h₁ : u 1 = 1 ∧ u 2 = 2 ∧ u 4 = 5) (h₂ : a^2 = 1) (h₃ : ∀ n ≥ 2, u (n + 1) * u (n - 1) = u n ^ 2 + a) : ∃ f : ℕ → ℤ, ∀ n ≥ 1, u n = f n := by sorry