Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§III, unnumbered auxiliary-cardinality bounds

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76.auxiliary_cardinalities

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z be finite nonempty alphabets and let W(x,y,z∣s)W(x,y,z\mid s)W(x,y,z∣s) be a normalized discrete memoryless broadcast channel. All entropies and information quantities are in bits. For an input law ppp, information quantities below use exactly the induced law p(s)W(x,y,z∣s)p(s)W(x,y,z\mid s)p(s)W(x,y,z∣s).

Alice draws a uniform finite message MMM, uses a possibly stochastic encoder to excite nnn channel uses, and observes (M,Xn)(M,X^n)(M,Xn). A public forward message Φ=ϕ(M,Xn)\Phi=\phi(M,X^n)Φ=ϕ(M,Xn) is visible to Bob and Eve. Their keys are KA=kA(M,Xn)K_A=k_A(M,X^n)KA​=kA​(M,Xn) and KB=kB(Yn,Φ)K_B=k_B(Y^n,\Phi)KB​=kB​(Yn,Φ). All design maps are fixed publicly before observations. Message and public alphabets follow the fixed-rate ceiling convention; the key alphabet at rate RRR has exactly 2⌈nR⌉2^{\lceil nR\rceil}2⌈nR⌉ labels. A weakly achievable rate RRR has one sequence of such codes with disagreement tending to zero, I(KA;Zn,Φ)/n→0I(K_A;Z^n,\Phi)/n\to0I(KA​;Zn,Φ)/n→0, and lim inf⁡H(KA)/n≥R\liminf H(K_A)/n\ge RliminfH(KA​)/n≥R.

Let Λ:S→[0,L]\Lambda:S\to[0,L]Λ:S→[0,L] be bounded and nonnegative, and let Γ>0\Gamma>0Γ>0 be admissible, meaning that a normalized input law of expected cost at most Γ\GammaΓ exists. Every operational code obeys n−1∑iΛ(Si)≤Γn^{-1}\sum_i\Lambda(S_i)\le\Gamman−1∑i​Λ(Si​)≤Γ almost surely; each single-letter optimization obeys ∑sp(s)Λ(s)≤Γ\sum_s p(s)\Lambda(s)\le\Gamma∑s​p(s)Λ(s)≤Γ. Excitation and public rates are unrestricted.

The unrestricted auxiliary maximum in Proposition 1 is attained with

∣W∣≤∣X∣∣S∣+3,∣U∣≤(∣X∣∣S∣+3)(∣X∣∣S∣+1).|\mathcal W|\le |X||S|+3,\qquad |\mathcal U|\le (|X||S|+3)(|X||S|+1).∣W∣≤∣X∣∣S∣+3,∣U∣≤(∣X∣∣S∣+3)(∣X∣∣S∣+1).

The maximizer obeys the fixed-channel factorization and the expected-cost constraint.

These bounds reduce the auxiliary optimization to bounded finite alphabets.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P76
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76

noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators

open Filter Set

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

-- Exact pinned primitives, inspected at their definitions before reuse.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier30.P12 (IsStochastic)

variable {S X Y Z : Type} [Fintype S] [Fintype X] [Fintype Y] [Fintype Z]
  [Nonempty S] [Nonempty X] [Nonempty Y] [Nonempty Z]

variable {n u w : ℕ}

/-- PDF p.4: bounded auxiliaries attain the unrestricted maximum. -/
theorem auxiliary_cardinalities (W : DMBC S X Y Z) (cost : S → ℝ) (Gamma : ℝ)
    (hcost : AdmissibleCost cost Gamma) :
    ∃ u w : ℕ, 0 < u ∧ 0 < w ∧ w ≤ Fintype.card X * Fintype.card S + 3 ∧
      u ≤ (Fintype.card X * Fintype.card S + 3) *
        (Fintype.card X * Fintype.card S + 1) ∧
      ∃ A : Aux S X u w, CostFeasibleInput cost Gamma A.input ∧
        IsGreatest (auxValues W cost Gamma) (auxObjective W A) := by sorry

end

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76
Source
The Sender-Excited Secret Key Agreement Model: Capacity, Reliability and Secrecy Exponents, arXiv:1107.4148v4, PDF p. 4, §III, unnumbered auxiliary-cardinality bounds
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For finite types S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z, let WWW give their nonemptiness and conditional probability laws Ws(x,y,z)W_s(x,y,z)Ws​(x,y,z). Suppose c:S→Rc:S\to\mathbb Rc:S→R and Γ∈R\Gamma\in\mathbb RΓ∈R satisfy Γ>0\Gamma>0Γ>0, 0≤c(s)≤L0\le c(s)\le L0≤c(s)≤L for every sss for some real LLL, and ∑sp(s)c(s)≤Γ\sum_s p(s)c(s)\le\Gamma∑s​p(s)c(s)≤Γ for at least one probability law ppp. Writing N=∣X∣∣S∣N=|X||S|N=∣X∣∣S∣, there exist natural numbers u,wu,wu,w satisfying

0<u,0<w,w≤N+3,u≤(N+3)(N+1),0<u,\qquad 0<w,\qquad w\le N+3,\qquad u\le(N+3)(N+1),0<u,0<w,w≤N+3,u≤(N+3)(N+1),

a probability law ppp with ∑sp(s)c(s)≤Γ\sum_s p(s)c(s)\le\Gamma∑s​p(s)c(s)≤Γ, and stochastic kernels q(a∣x,s)q(a\mid x,s)q(a∣x,s), r(b∣a)r(b\mid a)r(b∣a), with a<u,b<wa<u,b<wa<u,b<w, such that Iμ(U;Y∣V)−Iμ(U;Z∣V)I_\mu(U;Y\mid V)-I_\mu(U;Z\mid V)Iμ​(U;Y∣V)−Iμ​(U;Z∣V) is the greatest member of the set of these values over all positive finite auxiliary sizes and all feasible input laws and stochastic kernels. Here μ(b,a,s,x,y,z)=r(b∣a)q(a∣x,s)p(s)Ws(x,y,z)\mu(b,a,s,x,y,z)=r(b\mid a)q(a\mid x,s)p(s)W_s(x,y,z)μ(b,a,s,x,y,z)=r(b∣a)q(a∣x,s)p(s)Ws​(x,y,z), U=a,V=bU=a,V=bU=a,V=b, and I(A;B∣C)=H(A,C)−H(C)−H(A,B,C)+H(B,C)I(A;B\mid C)=H(A,C)-H(C)-H(A,B,C)+H(B,C)I(A;B∣C)=H(A,C)−H(C)−H(A,B,C)+H(B,C), with Shannon entropy in bits. All probabilities may include zeros, and the greatest-member assertion both asserts membership in the unrestricted value set and bounds every member from above.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me