Remark 7: unit-modulus ring scalars are eighth roots
OpenQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P85.unitScalar_eighthRootprove2quantum
Let and suppose . With ,
This is the scalar implication explaining the redundant final determinant condition in Corollary 2. It preserves absolute phase and also applies to zero-qubit unitary operators.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P85
Formal statement
noncomputable section
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P85
open scoped Classical BigOperators
open QAlgorithms
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P10
(InZomega InDomega Residue bits residue residueMultiply Reducible)
open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support21.P13
(synthesisRing integralRing coordinateValue HTLetter htWordMatrix EntriesInRing cliffordTLibrary)
local notation "omega" => QAlgorithms.gateT true true
local notation "sqrtTwo" => ((Real.sqrt 2 : ℝ) : ℂ)
/-- Remark 7, PDF p.6: unit-modulus ring scalars are exactly eighth-root powers. -/
theorem unitScalar_eighthRoot (z : ℂ) (ring : z ∈ synthesisRing) (unitModulus : ‖z‖ = 1) :
∃ m : Fin 8, z = omega ^ m.val := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P85
end
Source
Exact synthesis of multiqubit Clifford+T circuits, arXiv:1212.0506v3, PDF p. 6, Remark 7: unit-modulus ring scalars are eighth roots
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
For every complex number belonging to the smallest subring of containing and , if , then there exists an integer such that
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.