Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 4.6 — zˉ∈N\bar z\in Nzˉ∈N iff zˉ\bar zzˉ minimizes the lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff program for some λ∈Λˉ\lambda\in\bar\Lambdaλ∈Λˉ

Proved
SteuerChoo.Lexico.nondominated_iff_exists_lexMin

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

lexicographic-optimizationmulti-objective-optimizationp2o-batch-p200ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1pareto-optimality

Let Z⊆RkZ\subseteq\mathbb R^kZ⊆Rk (k≥1k\ge1k≥1) be a compact set of feasible criterion vectors with nondominated set NNN, and let z∗z^*z∗ be an ideal criterion vector for ZZZ. For every zˉ∈Z\bar z\in Zzˉ∈Z,

zˉ∈N  ⟺  ∃ λ∈Λˉ such that zˉ minimizes  lex min⁡{P1 α+P2 eT(z∗−z)} s.t. α≥λi(zi∗−zi), 1≤i≤k, z∈Z,\bar z\in N\iff \exists\,\lambda\in\bar\Lambda \text{ such that } \bar z \text{ minimizes }\ \operatorname{lex\,min}\big\{P_1\,\alpha+P_2\,e^{\mathsf T}(z^*-z)\big\}\ \text{s.t.}\ \alpha\ge\lambda_i(z^*_i-z_i),\ 1\le i\le k,\ z\in Z,zˉ∈N⟺∃λ∈Λˉ such that zˉ minimizes  lexmin{P1​α+P2​eT(z∗−z)} s.t. α≥λi​(zi∗​−zi​), 1≤i≤k, z∈Z,

where Λˉ={λ∈Rk∣λi≥0, ∑iλi=1}\bar\Lambda=\{\lambda\in\mathbb R^k\mid\lambda_i\ge0,\ \sum_i\lambda_i=1\}Λˉ={λ∈Rk∣λi​≥0, ∑i​λi​=1} and the lexicographic program first minimizes α=max⁡iλi(zi∗−zi)\alpha=\max_i\lambda_i(z^*_i-z_i)α=maxi​λi​(zi∗​−zi​) and then, among the first-stage minimizers, minimizes eT(z∗−z)=∑i(zi∗−zi)e^{\mathsf T}(z^*-z)=\sum_i(z^*_i-z_i)eT(z∗−z)=∑i​(zi∗​−zi​).

The lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff program therefore characterizes the nondominated set for an arbitrary (in particular nonconvex, continuous) feasible region, without choosing an augmentation parameter ρ\rhoρ.

Formalization Note SSS, the objectives fif_ifi​ and the variable α\alphaα are eliminated: ZZZ is the set of criterion vectors. Compactness of ZZZ is an added hypothesis, used by the direction ⇒\Rightarrow⇒ (through Theorem 4.5); the paper assumes SSS bounded. It is not removable: for a bounded but non-closed ZZZ the direction ⇒\Rightarrow⇒ can fail (example in the Formalization Note of Theorem 4.5). The direction ⇐\Leftarrow⇐ holds without it. The printed priority "P1<<<P2P_1<<<P_2P1​<<<P2​" is reversed relative to the paper's two-stage description on p. 336, which is what is encoded.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SteuerChoo_Lexico_nondominated
import Definitions.Def_SteuerChoo_Lexico_IsIdealVector
import Definitions.Def_SteuerChoo_Lexico_IsLexMin
Formal statement
namespace SteuerChoo.Lexico

theorem nondominated_iff_exists_lexMin {k : ℕ} [NeZero k]
    (Z : Set (Fin k → ℝ)) (zstar zbar : Fin k → ℝ)
    (hZc : IsCompact Z) (hideal : IsIdealVector Z zstar) (hzbar : zbar ∈ Z) :
    zbar ∈ nondominated Z ↔
      ∃ lam ∈ stdSimplex ℝ (Fin k), IsLexMin Z lam zstar zbar := by sorry

end SteuerChoo.Lexico
Source
Steuer and Choo, An Interactive Weighted Tchebycheff Procedure for Multiple Objective Programming, Math. Programming 26 (1983), p. 336, Theorem 4.6
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me